What Is the Molality of a 1.00 M LiBF4 Solution with a Density of 0.852 g/mL?

  • Thread starter Thread starter geffman1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Molality
AI Thread Summary
To find the molality of a 1.00 M LiBF4 solution with a density of 0.852 g/mL, first calculate the mass of 1 liter of the solution, which is 852 grams. Next, determine the number of moles of LiBF4 in the solution, which is 1 mole since it is a 1.00 M solution. The mass of LiBF4 (molar mass approximately 65.39 g/mol) is about 65.39 grams, leaving approximately 786.61 grams of solvent (acetonitrile). Finally, convert the mass of the solvent to kilograms and use the formula for molality (moles of solute per kg of solvent) to find the molality. The final result will provide the required molality of the solution.
geffman1
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


hey guys just wondering how to do this.
Lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4) is sold as a 1.00 M solution in
acetonitrile. If the solution has a density of 0.852 g/mL,
the molality of the solution is?


i tired using denisty=m/v and concentration=n/v but always had 2 variables. any help would be good. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1 L of your solution - what mass? What mass of LiBF4? What mass of solvent?
 
umm, 852 grams/litre?
 
Any doubts?
 
i think it right but don't know what the next step is?
 
Perhaps if you will read my very first post it will become clearer.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top