What Is the Molecular Formula of an Unknown Compound from Combustion Data?

AI Thread Summary
Burning a 3.230 g sample of an unknown compound in excess oxygen produced 4.7341 g of CO2, indicating complete conversion of carbon in the compound to carbon in CO2. The molecular weight of the unknown compound is given as 180.16 g/mol, but the lack of data on the mass of H2O produced complicates the determination of the molecular formula. The discussion reveals that 1.29 g of carbon is present in the sample, leading to uncertainty about the remaining mass attributed to hydrogen and potentially other elements. The ambiguity in the compound's composition hinders a straightforward calculation of its molecular formula. Ultimately, a brute force approach may be necessary to identify a reasonable formula that fits the provided data.
cp255
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Burning a 3.230 g sample of the unknown compound in an excess of oxygen produces 4.7341 g of CO2 (carbon dioxide). The carbon initially in the unknown compound is completely converted to carbon in the CO2.

If it is determined that the molecular weight of the unknown compound is 180.16 g/mol, what is the correct molecular formula?

I don't see how I can do this without know the mass of H2O.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you calculate mass of carbon in the compound sample?

Note: while you are missing something obvious, even after taking it into account it is still not possible to solve the problem, as it turns out compound contains more hydrogen than carbon (in terms of mass - so the molar ratio is even worse).
 
So there are 0.108 mols of C which is equal to 1.29g C. I still don't see how this helps since I do not know how much water was produced by this reaction.
 
OK, I probably misunderstood your question. Not that I am sure I understand it now.

My first idea was that if there was 3.230 g of the sample, and it contained 1.29 g of carbon, the remaining mass can be attributed to hydrogen - and then simply the answer is "no solution".

Chances are your comment about water really means "not knowing amount of water I can't calculate amount of oxygen in the original sample". Sadly, question is ambiguous, as it doesn't say anything about the composition - could be the compound contains any other elements as well. But let's assume it is just CnHkOl only.

We can easily calculate number of moles of the substance, so at least n in Cn is obvious. Then we know how much mass can be attributed to other elements. Then (with a brute force) we can check that there exist a reasonable CnHkOl formula that fits the data given - you just need such a pair of k, l that 16*l+k equals remaining part of the molar mass given.

I retract my earlier comment about lack of solution.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
100
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top