What is the name for F(x) and ##\mathcal{F}(x)## in this context?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
When we took the integral of a function f, the result is: \int f(x)dx = F(x) + C But, F(x) + C can be rewritten like: F(x) + C = \mathcal{F}(x) So, my first ask is: which is the name given for ##F(x)## and for ##\mathcal{F}(x)## ? I can't call both of primitive of f, because it's confuse. I already heard the term "family of antiderivative", I think that this term is the name of ##\mathcal{F}(x)##, thus, maybe, primitive is better for ##F(x)##. What do you think?

---

Second question: by FTC: \int_{x_0}^{x}f(x)dx = F(x) - F(x_0) implies that: F(x) = \int_{x_0}^{x}f(x)dx + F(x_0) This result, F(x), represents the ##F(x)## or the ##\mathcal{F}(x)## of the my 1st question?

---

OBS: if you affirm that F(x) of the 2nd question is equal to ##\mathcal{F}(x)## this implies that ##\int_{x_0}^{x}f(x)dx = F(x)## and ##F(x_0)=C## .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jhenrique said:
When we took the integral of a function f, the result is: \int f(x)dx = F(x) + C But, F(x) + C can be rewritten like: F(x) + C = \mathcal{F}(x)
What's the point? Is there some purpose in writing F(x) + C as ##\mathcal{F}(x)##?
Jhenrique said:
So, my first ask is: which is the name given for ##F(x)## and for ##\mathcal{F}(x)## ?
F is an antiderivative of f. I've also seen it called a primitive.
Jhenrique said:
I can't call both of primitive of f, because it's confuse. I already heard the term "family of antiderivative", I think that this term is the name of ##\mathcal{F}(x)##, thus, maybe, primitive is better for ##F(x)##. What do you think?

---

Second question: by FTC: \int_{x_0}^{x}f(x)dx = F(x) - F(x_0) implies that: F(x) = \int_{x_0}^{x}f(x)dx + F(x_0) This result, F(x), represents the ##F(x)## or the ##\mathcal{F}(x)## of the my 1st question?
F is any antiderivative of f (or any primitive of f).
Jhenrique said:
---

OBS: if you affirm that F(x) of the 2nd question is equal to ##\mathcal{F}(x)## this implies that ##\int_{x_0}^{x}f(x)dx = F(x)## and ##F(x_0)=C## .
 
There is a importnat difference between ##F(x)## and ##\mathcal{F}(x)##, the 1st is a particular solution for ##\int f(x) dx## and the 2nd is general solution. By be different solutions, maybe they have different names. How I already heard a lot times the term "antiderivative" and "family of antiderivative", I asked if those terms are the names for ##F(x)## and for ##\mathcal{F}(x)## ...

EDIT: YEAH! An teacher confirmed my hypothesis above.
 
Last edited:
Jhenrique said:
There is a importnat difference between ##F(x)## and ##\mathcal{F}(x)##, the 1st is a particular solution for ##\int f(x) dx## and the 2nd is general solution.
I disagree. The expression F(x) + C doesn't represent a particular antiderivative unless C is somehow specified to be a particular value. In that sense (i.e., C being an unspecified arbitrary value) F(x) + C represents the entire family of antiderivatives. Again, I still don't see the point of writing both F(x) + C and ##\mathcal{F}(x)##. IMO it's much ado about a minor point.
Jhenrique said:
By be different solutions, maybe they have different names. How I already heard a lot times the term "antiderivative" and "family of antiderivative", I asked if those terms are the names for ##F(x)## and for ##\mathcal{F}(x)## ...

EDIT: YEAH! An teacher confirmed my hypothesis above.
I still disagree.
For example, consider ##\int x^2 dx##.
One antiderivative is (1/3)x3 + 7.
All antiderivatives have the form (1/3)x3 + C.
 
Back
Top