What is the name of this inequality involving sums of squares and rectangles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noesis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an inequality involving sums of squares and products, questioning whether it has a recognized name. The inequality suggests that the sum of squares is greater than the sum of products, illustrated with examples. However, some participants argue against its validity, providing counterexamples where the inequality does not hold. A mention of the rearrangement inequality is made, which relates to a similar concept involving two sets of numbers. Overall, the thread highlights the curiosity about naming this inequality while addressing its mathematical validity.
Noesis
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
It's a trivial inequality...but I am curious if there is a popular name for it already. I have not been able to find it through conventional online search.

a12 + a22 + ... + an2 > a1*a2 + a2*a1 + a2*a3 + ... + an*an-1

Such as:

a2 + b2 + c2 > ab + ac + bc + ba + bc + ac = 2(ab + bc + ac)

Which can nicely be envisioned geometrically as sum of squares will always be bigger than corresponding sum of rectangles.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Noesis said:
It's a trivial inequality...but I am curious if there is a popular name for it already. I have not been able to find it through conventional online search.

a12 + a22 + ... + an2 > a1*a2 + a2*a1 + a2*a3 + ... + an*an-1

Such as:

a2 + b2 + c2 > ab + ac + bc + ba + bc + ac = 2(ab + bc + ac)

Which can nicely be envisioned geometrically as sum of squares will always be bigger than corresponding sum of rectangles.

It doesn't look like it's true. Let a=b>c. Then a2+b2=2ab, while c2<2(ac+bc).
 
Noesis said:
Which can nicely be envisioned geometrically as sum of squares will always be bigger than corresponding sum of rectangles.
There are a lot more of the rectangles than there are the squares... in fact, another easy source of counterexamples is just to make all the numbers the same! e.g. if they're all 1, then the L.H.S. is n, but the R.H.S. is n(n-1)
 
A very similar inequality is called the rearrangement inequality which works when you rearrange two sets of number, not one.
 
Noesis said:
It's a trivial inequality...but I am curious if there is a popular name for it already. I have not been able to find it through conventional online search.

a12 + a22 + ... + an2 > a1*a2 + a2*a1 + a2*a3 + ... + an*an-1

Such as:

a2 + b2 + c2 > ab + ac + bc + ba + bc + ac = 2(ab + bc + ac)

Which can nicely be envisioned geometrically as sum of squares will always be bigger than corresponding sum of rectangles.

Short tutorial on the subject.

First to get it right you need to omit half the terms.
a2 + b2 + c2 >= ab + bc + ac
There is a general theorem for vector spaces with inner (dot) products, namely
A.B=|A||B|cosx, where x is the angle between A and B.

For the case you are interested in:
A=(a1,a2,a3,...,an) while B=(a2,a3,...,an,a1)
 
mathman said:
Short tutorial on the subject.

First to get it right you need to omit half the terms.
a2 + b2 + c2 >= ab + bc + ac
There is a general theorem for vector spaces with inner (dot) products, namely
A.B=|A||B|cosx, where x is the angle between A and B.

For the case you are interested in:
A=(a1,a2,a3,...,an) while B=(a2,a3,...,an,a1)

I had a homework assignment in my first year of undergrad asking for us to prove the Cauchy-Riemann-Schwartz inequality (a.k.a. the triangle inequality), and Googling one or both of these terms seem to generate at least a few results that have a similar form.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top