What is the Nature of Stephen Hawking's 'Metaphysical' Theory of Everything?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kaspah_2k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Toe
AI Thread Summary
Stephen Hawking's new book presents his interpretation of a 'Theory of Everything' (TOE), prompting discussions on metaphysics and cosmology. The author shares a personal theory suggesting that all matter, including computers and humans, shares a common biochemical makeup, challenging perceptions of reality. They propose the existence of multiple dimensions, where concepts of space and time differ significantly from our understanding. The theory posits that in one dimension, everything is interconnected at a fundamental level, making distance irrelevant. The author encourages others to share their own theories, emphasizing the value of diverse perspectives in understanding existence.
Kaspah_2k
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
a 'metaphysical' "TOE"...

hi there,this is only a small portion of my ideas as i don't have enough time to write all of them down, so...

I read that Stephen Hawking has just released a new book detailing his own version of his TOE. Everyone who studies metaphysics,cosmology and even astronomy will have their own view on how the world works but i wonder what stephen has to say.

I obviously have my own idea which isn't to difficult to understand. I believe that everything is all made out of the same bio-chemical make-up. so this computer I am writing on is metaphysically the same as me as well as the information coming off the screen (in electrons)and even the chips which make it function. I also don't think we percieve the 'real' world as it were. We only understand what we can see and cannot look at ourselves from outside our box.

Imagine if you were stuck in your house your whole life and you understood what went on around you locally but to understand it as a whole, you would have to go outside your house and see it from an outside view. This is just Anthropometrics (which is looking at something from someone/something elses point of view) but this can be realative to any other study. so we can't really understand what happens in a world where time,space and conscience isn't realative.

So from there i go on to time and space itself. We can only theorize what might be outside our field of understanding. i believe that there's around a dozen dimensions.I think that in another dimension from us. other than cells,molecules and the magnetic field, i think the furthest dimension is everything and nothing at the same time.

As there is no space in this dimension, a distant quasar and the tip of our finger are connected at the smallest scale and point in space/time that the distance from A to B is always Zero (which obviously isn't possible in our dimension) and this is basically my Theory.

Even though I've just lobbied my TOE into a simple explanation. My theory goes far deeper than can possibly be communicated to the outside world (that being you -> ) so verbalisation of a TOE is inexplicably difficult. I must ALWAYS remember though that in the truth of existence, I can never truly say that mine or anyone elses theory is correct (or at least until we get out our box) which i think any person should remember...

Well i hope that some of you out there get in touch and try to put your own 'Theories of Everything' into context in this thread as i enjoy in engaging conflicting beliefs (interaction is what makes us truly Conscience)

And to think,ive never benn to college or Uni to get tought all this as it were, i just read books in my own house and have no-one to say this is right and this is wrong. so can either be a bad thing or a good thing depending on how you structure your learning.

Well i hope to read some interesting replies...

p.s and please don't just post your theories on how wrong i am as I've heard them all

hahahaha
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well...

Does no-one have their own 'Theory of everything" to talk about?
 
interesting theory, hmm
i'll try and think one up of my own
hmm i'll have to wake my brain up
first...
 
sorry kaspah_2k my brains not up to it[b(]
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top