What Is the One-Year Forward Rate in Year 2 for Government Bonds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter monsmatglad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonds Government
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the one-year forward rate in year 2 for government bonds based on given yields. The yields for maturities of 1 to 4 years are 5%, 8%, 9%, and 8%, respectively. Participants are asked to determine the forward rate using the provided yields, with one contributor suggesting the answer is 11% based on a formula involving compounding. Another participant highlights the option to choose "I choose not to answer" and humorously suggests it could be a valid choice. The conversation emphasizes the importance of showing work in calculations to avoid deletion of posts.
monsmatglad
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
hi. i have a problem. it's task 13. please help =)

12. Based on information about the yields of government bonds you have the
following term structure:
Time to maturity 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years
Yield 5% 8% 9% 8%
What is the expected return on the bond if you buy it at time t=0 and sell it at
time t=4?
(a) 7.0%
(b) 8.0%
(c) 10.0%
(d) 11.0%
(e) I choose not to answer.


13. Based on the information given in question 12, what is the one-year forward rate
in year 2?
(a) 7.0%
(b) 8.0%
(c) 10.0%
(d) 11.0%
(e) I choose not to answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They actually let you choose "I choose not to answer"? I would always choose that and then argue that it is clearly the correct answer!
 
Well, assuming these are annual compound rates:

d. 11%

[1.09]^3/[1.08]^2-1=0.11028

But if you want, you can take the long way:

1. [0.05+x]/2=0.08
2. [0.05+x+y]/3=0.09

*where x is the one-yr forward rate after year 1
and y is your answer
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top