What is the optimal communication time for a given set of parameters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zak100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Log
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation for communication time, expressed as ##t_{comm} = (t_s + t_wm)log(p) + 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1)##. Participants are exploring the calculation of logarithms, specifically ##log_2(36)##, and its implications in the context of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the calculation of logarithms, questioning the validity of specific logarithmic values, and discussing the properties of logarithms, such as the product rule. There are also attempts to simplify expressions involving logarithms.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to understand and calculate logarithmic values. Some participants have provided guidance on logarithmic properties and conversion methods, while others express confusion over specific calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the correct value of ##log_2(36)##, and multiple interpretations of the expressions are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is an ongoing exploration of assumptions related to logarithmic calculations.

zak100
Messages
462
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
I can't solve a log base 2 equation
Relevant Equations
##\mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1)##
Hi,
I am trying to solve the following equation:
##\mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
##\mathbf (10+0.01 * 1000) log(36) + 2 * 2(5) ##

I think log(36) would be 18. Note log is ##\mathbf log_2 ##

Somebody please guide me.

Zulfi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zak100 said:
Hi,
I am trying to solve the following equation:
##\mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
##\mathbf (10+0.01 * 1000) log(36) + 2 * 2(5) ##
Neither of these is an equation. Are you trying to simplify this expression?
zak100 said:
I think log(36) would be 18. Note log is ##\mathbf log_2 ##
No.
If it were true that ##\log_2(36) = 18##, then it would also have to be true that ##2^{18} = 36##. ##\log_2(36)## is somewhere between 5 and 6, because ##32 = 2^5 < 36 < 2^6 = 64##.

Also, there are conversion formulas for changing a log in one base to a log in a different base. Most calculators don't have buttons for ##\log_2##, but they do have them for ##\log_{10}## and ##\log_e = \ln##.
 
Hi,
Okay, equation is:
##t_{comm} = \mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
I am able to find out how to calculate ##log_2##

Zulfi.
 
What makes you think that the log of 36 to the base 2 is 18? It's not.
 
zak100 said:
Hi,
Okay, equation is:
##t_{comm} = \mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
I am able to find out how to calculate ##log_2##\

Zulfi.
Here's how to convert from one log base to another, assuming you want to write ##\log_a(x)## in some other base, b.
Let ##y = \log_a(x)##
##\Leftrightarrow a^y = x##
##\Leftrightarrow \log_b(a^y) = \log_b(x)##
##\Leftrightarrow y\log_b(a) = \log_b(x)##
##\Leftrightarrow y = \frac{\log_b(x)}{\log_b(a)}##
##\Leftrightarrow \log_a(x) = \frac{\log_b(x)}{\log_b(a)}##
In the last equation, I replaced y with ##\log_a(x)##
 
Hi,
I tried this :
##log_2 2^2 * 9 ##

2 goes with 2 so we are left with 2 * 9 which is 18. I did something like that in my Algorithm course.

Thanks for asking.

Zulfi.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
The log of a product of two factors is equal to the sum of the logs if the factors.
 
zak100 said:
Hi,
I tried this :
##log_2 2^2 * 9 ##

2 goes with 2 so we are left with 2 * 9 which is 18. I did something like that in my Algorithm course.
Is the above ##\log_2(2^2) * 9## or is it ##\log_2(2^2 * 9)##?
Without parentheses, what you wrote is ambiguous.

Also, what you have above doesn't seem related to what you were asking about:
##\mathbf (10+0.01 * 1000) log(36) + 2 * 2(5) ##
It seems that you are still trying to figure out how to calculate ##\log_2(36)##

Simplifying your expression above, it is ##10010\log_2(36) + 20##. I don't see what this has to do with what I quoted at the top of this post.
 
Thanks all of you. This problem is solved now.

Zulfi.
 
  • #10
Okay, equation is:
##t_{comm} = \mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
16K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K