What is the optimal communication time for a given set of parameters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zak100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Log
zak100
Messages
462
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
I can't solve a log base 2 equation
Relevant Equations
##\mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1)##
Hi,
I am trying to solve the following equation:
##\mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
##\mathbf (10+0.01 * 1000) log(36) + 2 * 2(5) ##

I think log(36) would be 18. Note log is ##\mathbf log_2 ##

Somebody please guide me.

Zulfi.
 
on Phys.org
zak100 said:
Hi,
I am trying to solve the following equation:
##\mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
##\mathbf (10+0.01 * 1000) log(36) + 2 * 2(5) ##
Neither of these is an equation. Are you trying to simplify this expression?
zak100 said:
I think log(36) would be 18. Note log is ##\mathbf log_2 ##
No.
If it were true that ##\log_2(36) = 18##, then it would also have to be true that ##2^{18} = 36##. ##\log_2(36)## is somewhere between 5 and 6, because ##32 = 2^5 < 36 < 2^6 = 64##.

Also, there are conversion formulas for changing a log in one base to a log in a different base. Most calculators don't have buttons for ##\log_2##, but they do have them for ##\log_{10}## and ##\log_e = \ln##.
 
Hi,
Okay, equation is:
##t_{comm} = \mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
I am able to find out how to calculate ##log_2##

Zulfi.
 
What makes you think that the log of 36 to the base 2 is 18? It's not.
 
zak100 said:
Hi,
Okay, equation is:
##t_{comm} = \mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
I am able to find out how to calculate ##log_2##\

Zulfi.
Here's how to convert from one log base to another, assuming you want to write ##\log_a(x)## in some other base, b.
Let ##y = \log_a(x)##
##\Leftrightarrow a^y = x##
##\Leftrightarrow \log_b(a^y) = \log_b(x)##
##\Leftrightarrow y\log_b(a) = \log_b(x)##
##\Leftrightarrow y = \frac{\log_b(x)}{\log_b(a)}##
##\Leftrightarrow \log_a(x) = \frac{\log_b(x)}{\log_b(a)}##
In the last equation, I replaced y with ##\log_a(x)##
 
Hi,
I tried this :
##log_2 2^2 * 9 ##

2 goes with 2 so we are left with 2 * 9 which is 18. I did something like that in my Algorithm course.

Thanks for asking.

Zulfi.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
The log of a product of two factors is equal to the sum of the logs if the factors.
 
zak100 said:
Hi,
I tried this :
##log_2 2^2 * 9 ##

2 goes with 2 so we are left with 2 * 9 which is 18. I did something like that in my Algorithm course.
Is the above ##\log_2(2^2) * 9## or is it ##\log_2(2^2 * 9)##?
Without parentheses, what you wrote is ambiguous.

Also, what you have above doesn't seem related to what you were asking about:
##\mathbf (10+0.01 * 1000) log(36) + 2 * 2(5) ##
It seems that you are still trying to figure out how to calculate ##\log_2(36)##

Simplifying your expression above, it is ##10010\log_2(36) + 20##. I don't see what this has to do with what I quoted at the top of this post.
 
Thanks all of you. This problem is solved now.

Zulfi.
 
  • #10
Okay, equation is:
##t_{comm} = \mathbf (t_s + t_wm)log(p)+ 2t_h (\sqrt{p} - 1) ##
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
23K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
17K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K