What is the optimal gas for forced air cooling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike_In_Plano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Cooling Gas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the optimal gas for forced air cooling, highlighting the importance of thermal conductivity and specific heat. While hydrogen and helium have high thermal conductivity, safety concerns arise due to flammability. SF6 is suggested as a potentially better alternative due to its specific heat properties. However, the consensus leans towards using air, as it is inexpensive, non-toxic, and non-corrosive, making it suitable for closed, low-temperature systems. The focus remains on utilizing existing cooling infrastructure while ensuring safety and efficiency.
Mike_In_Plano
Messages
700
Reaction score
35
A friend and I got into a debate regarding the characteristics desired in a gas for forced air cooling.

Having worked with mass flow meters, I was well away of how hydrogen and helium had high thermal conductivity. However, as my friend pointed out, simply having high conductivity (i.e. a light molecule) wouldn't necessarily mean a gas was the best choice for forced air cooling. In that case, the specific heat would become important and perhaps a gas like SF6 would be more ideal.

Does anyone have any thoughts to offer?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For safety, I would stay away from flammable gasses like hydrogen and oxygen. Ditto for poisonous or corrosive gasses like fluorine or chlorine (in fact, any halogen).

I guess the ideal gas for forced air cooling would be ... air. It's cheap, abundant, non-poisonous, and non-corrosive.
 
We are dealing with a closed, refrigerated system that operates at low temperatures (i.e. no moisture allowed). It is desirable to utilize existing fans and heat spreaders within this system, but the nature of the preferred atmosphere is in question.

Please avoid anecdotal references and stick purely with the science.

Thanks,

- Mike
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top