What Is the Orbital Angular Momentum of an Electron in the 3p State?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rob malkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectroscopy
rob malkin
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

hope you are all well.

I would like to ask a simple spectroscopy question please.

"An electron has been excited from the ground state to the 3p state. Find the orbital angular momentum of the electron"

This is my interpritation of the question,

3p means n=3
thus, l[angular momentum quantum number] = 0,1,2

thus, to calculate the orbital angular momentum... we have 3 calculations

using
L=[sqrt(l(l+1))] X h[bar]

so one will be 0

the other root2 h[bar], and

the last root6 h[bar]?

Hope I am right.

QM is easier to work than spectroscopy.

Thanks for reading

very much appreciated.

Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fact that the atom is in a p state (3p) tells you something about the orbital angular momentum. Check your textbook for the significance of s, p, d, f...
 
jtbell said:
The fact that the atom is in a p state (3p) tells you something about the orbital angular momentum. Check your textbook for the significance of s, p, d, f...

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/orbdep.html#c1

does l=1?

s p d f ...
0 1 2 3...[l]?EDIT: so 3p means n=3 l=1? what about the orbital magnetic number m?, and spin, and total quantum number j?
ie, is 3p not a total description of the electron, would you need to say...3,p,0,1/2,1/2?
 
Last edited:
I have been looking at this for a while, and think I might have a handle of it but would like some opinions...

So, if the electron in the 3p state 'relaxes' and drops to say, the n=1,2 level, am I right in thinking that the electron configuration of the electron is...

1)
If it relaxes to the 1s state, n=1, l=0, m=0

2)
If it relaxes to the 2p state, n=2, l=0, m=0
3)
If it relaxes to the 2p state,
n=2, l=1, m=-1
n=2, l=1, m=0
n=2, l=1, m=+1secondly, because I am dealing with hydrogen am I right in saying that the energy of the electron only depends upon n?I hope this is right, i am getting rather confused by it all.

Thank you for reading.

R
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top