What is the origin and purpose of hyperbolic trig functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origin and purpose of hyperbolic trigonometric functions, specifically their relationship to right triangles. The user illustrates this by comparing the traditional sine and cosine functions with hyperbolic sine and cosine, highlighting the Pythagorean theorem's application in both cases. Questions arise about the existence and construction of angle D in hyperbolic space, with some participants noting the differences between metrics in hyperbolic and Euclidean geometry. The conversation also touches on the historical context of hyperbolic functions, questioning whether they were developed to address right triangles in the complex plane. Overall, the thread explores the mathematical foundations and implications of hyperbolic trigonometric functions.
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I hope this is the right place to ask this question.

Imagine a right triangle with vertices A,B and C and corresponding opposite sides a, b and c such that there is a right angle at B and side b is the hypontenuse. Let the length of side b = 1. If I label side a as sin(A) and side c as cos(A), then the Pythagorean theorem gives us sin^2(A)+cos^2(A)=1, which we believe to be true in general.

Now use the same triangle but instead let the length of side a =1 and let us call side c "sinh(D)" and b (the hypotenuse) as "cosh(D)". Then the Pythagorean theorem gives us cosh^2(D)-sinh^2(D)=1, which we also believe to be true in general.

My question is, where is angle D? Can it be constructed from this triangle or does it have to be found with pure computation (meaning without the aid of a diagram)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi snoopies622! :smile:
snoopies622 said:
I hope this is the right place to ask this question.

You should obviously have asked it in hyperbolic space. :mad:
My question is, where is angle D? Can it be constructed from this triangle or does it have to be found with pure computation (meaning without the aid of a diagram)?

Do you mean a (+,-) metric, like Minkowski space, or do you mean an isotropic homogenous metric, like that of a sphere, but with negative curvature?

If you mean (+,-), then it isn't a real angle, since one dimension is "space" and the other is "time", but yes the sides would be coshD and sinhD, and their ratio tanhD would be a speed, not an angle.

If you mean what I call hyperbolic space, then the angles are ordinary angles, and only the sides are hyperbolic angles. Sin = opposite/hypotenuse still works, but cos = adjacent/hypotenuse doesn't …and there is no D, only a θ. :smile:
 
Last edited:
I just meant in flat space with a Euclidean metric, but perhaps under those conditions no construction (with straight edge and compass only) is possible. Does anyone know the original purpose of hyperbolic trig functions? Was it to deal with right triangles in the complex plane?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top