What is the origin of the factor 3?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the origin of the factor 3 in the three-phonon interactions Hamiltonian $$H_{\mathrm{ph}-\mathrm{ph}}$$. The Hamiltonian is expressed as $$H_{\mathrm{ph}-\mathrm{ph}}=\sum_{i j k} M_{i j k}\left(b_{-i}^{\dagger}+b_i\right)\left(b_{-j}^{\dagger}+b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^{\dagger}+b_k\right)$$, where the matrix elements $$M_{ijk}$$ are symmetric and satisfy specific conditions. The factor 3 arises from the symmetry properties of the indices and the Kronecker delta function, specifically when evaluating the commutation relations in the Heisenberg equation of motion. The discussion emphasizes the importance of not using the index $$i$$ as a summation variable when deriving the equation of motion for a fixed $$b_i$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with phonon interactions and quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and symmetry properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Heisenberg equation of motion in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of symmetric tensors in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the role of Kronecker delta in simplifying summations
  • Investigate three-phonon interactions and their implications in condensed matter physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and condensed matter physics, as well as graduate students studying quantum field theory and phonon interactions.

July Zou
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
below
Relevant Equations
below
We have the three-phonon interactions Hamiltonian $$H_{\mathrm{ph}-\mathrm{ph}}=\sum_{i j k} M_{i j k}\left(b_{-i}^{\dagger}+b_i\right)\left(b_{-j}^{\dagger}+b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^{\dagger}+b_k\right).$$
We will not need the explicit expression for the $$M_{ijk}$$
here, but only note that it is symmetric in all its indices and fulfill $$M_{i j k}=M_{-i-j-k}^*$$ and further assume $$M_{-iij}=0$$
To get the Heisenberg equation of motion
$$ i\hbar \frac{d}{d t} b_i =\left[b_i, H_{ph-ph} \right]$$, we have derived
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\left[b_i, H_{ph-ph} \right]&=\Big[ b_i, \sum_{i j k} M_{i j k}\left(b_{-i}^{\dagger}+b_i\right) \left(b_{-j}^{\dagger}+b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^{\dagger}+b_k\right) \Big]\\
&= \sum_{ijk} M_{ijk} \Big(\left[b_i, b_{-i}^\dagger + b_i\right]\left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right) \\
&\quad + \left(b_{-i}^\dagger + b_i\right)\left[b_i, b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right]\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right) \\
&\quad + \left(b_{-i}^\dagger + b_i\right)\left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right)\left[b_i, b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right] \Big)\\
&= \sum_{ijk} M_{ijk} \Big(\delta_{i,-i} \left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right)\\
&\quad +\delta_{i,-j} \left(b_{-i}^\dagger + b_i\right)\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right)+ \delta_{i,-k}\left(b_{-i}^\dagger + b_i\right)\left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right) \Big)\\
&=\sum_{jk} \Big( M_{-ijk} \left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right)\\
&\quad +\underbrace{M_{-jjk}}_{0} \left(b_{-i}^\dagger + b_i\right)\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right)+ \underbrace{M_{-kjk}}_{0}\left(b_{-i}^\dagger + b_i\right)\left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right) \Big)\\
&=\sum_{jk} M_{-ijk} \left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

However, the result is $$3\sum_{jk} M_{-ijk} \left(b_{-j}^\dagger + b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^\dagger + b_k\right)$$, where is the factor 3 from? Should it be $$\sum_{ijk}M_{ijk}\delta_{i,-i}=3\sum_{jk}M_{-ijk}?$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
July Zou said:
$$
\begin{aligned}
\left[b_i, H_{ph-ph} \right]&=\Big[ b_i, \sum_{i j k} M_{i j k}\left(b_{-i}^{\dagger}+b_i\right) \left(b_{-j}^{\dagger}+b_j\right)\left(b_{-k}^{\dagger}+b_k\right) \Big]\\

\end{aligned}
$$
You should not use ##i## as a summation index if you are getting the equation of motion for ##b_i## with some fixed ##i##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K