What Is the Oscillation Period of a Rod Attached to a Spring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the oscillation period of a 200g rod attached to a spring, with the rod pivoted at one end and hanging vertically. The rod's length is 20 cm, and the spring constant is 3 N/m. Participants explore the angular frequency of the rod and consider how to incorporate the spring's effects into the oscillation period calculation. There is uncertainty about whether to treat the system as a simple harmonic oscillator and how to combine the periods of the rod and spring. The key focus is on determining the total restoring force and applying the appropriate equations for the period of the combined system.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 200g uniform rod is pivoted at one end. The other end is attached to a horizontal spring. The spring is neither stretched nor compressed when the rod hangs straight down. What is the rod's oscillation period? You can assume that the rod's angle from the vertical is always small. The rod's length is 20 cm and the spring's constant is 3N/m.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Without the spring the rod's angular frequency would be sqrt[(.200)(9.80)(.10m)/(.0027kgm^2) Then I could go to period. Will someone tell me how I can get the period for the spring? The problem is I am used to doing problems with just a spring and a block, but I am not quite sure how to deal with the extended object. Would I just use omega= sqrt [k/m] with mass .200kg and k = 3.0 N/m? Then I could go to period, and maybe add the two period together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a simple harmonic oscillator the restoring force is F = ma = -kx. what is the total restoring force for the pendulum string combination? If that is in the form -kx you can use the equaton for the period of a simple harmonic oscillator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top