What is the partial derivative of f with respect to w?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the partial derivative of the function f(x,y) = x + 2y with respect to the variable w, where w = x + y. Participants are exploring the implications of treating w as a variable and the relationships between the variables involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of partial derivatives and question which variables should be held constant during differentiation. There is uncertainty about whether to treat y or x as constant, leading to different interpretations of the problem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, with some participants suggesting that the question may be underspecified. Multiple interpretations are being considered, and while some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the chain rule, there is no consensus on how to proceed or on the correctness of various approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express that the problem may lack sufficient information to arrive at a definitive answer, and there is a suggestion that the question could be more open-ended than initially presented.

slr77
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Define f(x,y) = x+2y, w = x+y. What is ∂f / ∂w?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


f = w+y so:

∂f/∂w = ∂(w+y)/∂w = ∂w/∂w + ∂y/∂w = 1 + ∂y/∂w. But I'm really not sure if this is right and if it right so far, I can't figure out what ∂y/∂w should be...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
slr77 said:
∂f/∂w = ∂(w+y)/∂w
This is right.

Now partial derivative means the derivative of given parameter.The other parameters will be assumed constant.Cause they are not changing respet to that parameter.I mean If I set two parameter a and b and make a fuction using them (It can be anything).Lets call it f(a,b)=a+b then ∂f/∂a means derivative of function respet to a not b.So we will assume b is constant and ∂f/∂a=1 so.Do the same thing.
 
@RyanH42: the problem here: which other variable is supposed to be constant? Why should it be y (as you seem to suggest), not x, or x-y? Those would lead to different answers.
 
RyanH42 said:
This is right.

Now partial derivative means the derivative of given parameter.The other parameters will be assumed constant.Cause they are not changing respet to that parameter.I mean If I set two parameter a and b and make a fuction using them (It can be anything).Lets call it f(a,b)=a+b then ∂f/∂a means derivative of function respet to a not b.So we will assume b is constant and ∂f/∂a=1 so.Do the same thing.

But w depends implicitly on y so can I really take y as constant? If I get y in terms w (y = w-x) and continue this way (so 1 + ∂y/∂w = 1 + ∂(w-x)/∂w). I just get an endless chain of 1+1+1+1+1... That's why I think what I'm doing is not right.
 
I don't know but he answer might be this ∂f/∂w=∂f/∂y.∂y/∂w+∂f/∂x.∂x/∂w look this rule.
 
RyanH42 said:
I don't know but he answer might be this ∂f/∂w=∂f/∂y.∂y/∂w+∂f/∂x.∂x/∂w look this rule.

I think this is the chain rule but we haven't learned that yet. I'll read ahead and come back to this and make sense of it but apparently there should be a way to do this without directly making use of the chain rule.
 
I have an idea ∂f/∂w=1 + ∂y/∂w now ∂f/∂w=1 + 1/∂w/∂y then ∂f/∂w=2 Its a trick but I don't know its ture or not.I know it was stupid idea
 
Last edited:
This problem can't be solved, it is underspecified.

RyanH42 said:
I have an idea ∂f/∂w=1 + ∂y/∂w now ∂f/∂w=1 + 1/∂w/∂y then ∂f/∂w=2 Its a trick but I don't know its ture or not.I know it was stupid idea

So ∂y/∂w + 1/∂w/∂y = 0? It wasn't actually a stupid idea, you just made an algebra mistake.
 
verty said:
This problem can't be solved, it is underspecified.

Hmm, ok. I think I should have posted the full problem because I think it's more open ended than what my original post conveys:

problem.PNG


I'm just treating w as the variable and going from there but maybe that's not the right definition? So is there some way to do this problem that makes sense?
 
  • #10
slr77 said:
Hmm, ok. I think I should have posted the full problem because I think it's more open ended than what my original post conveys:

View attachment 85560

I'm just treating w as the variable and going from there but maybe that's not the right definition? So is there some way to do this problem that makes sense?

I still maintain this is a flawed question and you should move on. It doesn't contain enough information to answer it.
 
  • #11
verty said:
So ∂y/∂w + 1/∂w/∂y = 0?
Is this true ? or You mean ∂w/∂w + 1/∂w/∂y ? I am confused
 
  • #12
If you use chain rule you get 2 again.I think answer is 2.
##∂f/∂w=∂f/∂y.∂y/∂w+∂f/∂x.∂x/∂w##
##∂f/∂y=2##
##∂y/∂w=1/2##
##∂f/∂x=1##
##∂x/∂w=1##
So answer is 2 I guess.

Whats your's idea ?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
##f(x,y) = x + 2y##
##{∂f \over ∂w} = {∂x \over ∂w} + 2 {∂y \over ∂w}##

The problem happens because we don't know what ##{∂x \over ∂w}## and ##{∂y \over ∂w}## are, we don't have enough information to determine them. If this isn't clear, be sure to look again at partial derivatives and what they mean.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
RyanH42 said:
##∂y/∂w=1/2##
##∂x/∂w=1##
w=x+y. Why should the two derivatives be different?

Also, the rule doesn't work like that with partial derivatives. You could introduce arbitrary new parameters (e. g. z=x) and add more and more terms that would change the result.
 
  • #15
Here my last idea then.The question ask's us for general solution and we do the general solution : ##{∂f \over ∂w} = {∂x \over ∂w} + 2 {∂y \over ∂w}## or
##{∂f \over ∂w} = {∂f \over ∂x}{∂x \over ∂w} +{∂f \over ∂w}{∂y \over ∂w}##
Part b asks solve these equation with spesific parameters.I think there must be some difference between question a and b so I thought we can think x and y like numbers or actually constant parameters.So I mean f=x+2y is a constant cause x and y is contant so the answer is zero.
 
  • #16
Forgive me but Why you guys stop answering the question.there's a problem and you are avoiding to answer.If one of you find the answer he can tell here cause I am curios.
 
  • #17
The question (a) asks for the definition of the derivative of a general function f(x,y)...The definition of the derivatives is with limits I guess...even with or without limits, you can write your 2nd expression in p#15, and try to find the dx/dw, dy/dw.

(b) asks for the given function: f=x+2y
 
  • #18
Maybe we are overthinking this. There is no explicit dependence on w in f...
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K