What is the path of the ball's movement in different scenarios?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sina_mech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
sina_mech
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hi friends , please help me to solve this problem , THANKS :

A ball with radius r and mass m with angel 30 with horizon and with velocity V, according to figure, enters to a semispherical shell with radius R and the coefficient of friction between semispherical shell and ball is µ . This semispherical shell is in the Car moving at the circular path with radius a .assume that the semispherical shell is without any linear or lateral movement on the car:

A: assume that the velocity of car and the semispherical shell is zero, and determine the path of the Ball’s movement.

B: assume that the semispherical shell rotate about its z-axe with constant angular velocity of w1 and determine the path of the Ball’s movement.

C: assume that the semispherical shell rotate about its z-axe with angular velocity of w1, and the car moves in circular path with constant angular velocity of w2. Determine the path of the Ball’s movement.
 

Attachments

  • Dynamics Project.JPG
    Dynamics Project.JPG
    10 KB · Views: 482
Physics news on Phys.org
No help ??
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top