Padmal said:
my definition of piezometric head is the height of water
I understand that it is a pressure expressed as a height of water, but what height (or what pressure)?
According to all references I've found, piezometric head is the same as hydraulic head.
I finally found this diagram:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_head#/media/File:Relation_between_heads_flowing.svg.
This indicates that the elevation head (z) is simply the geophysical height difference (z
A-z
B=-2m of water here) and the pressure head is the gauge pressure difference between A and B, expressed as a height of water (##\phi##). The piezometric/hydraulic head (h) is the elevation head plus the pressure head, ##h = \phi+z##. That very equation appears at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_head#Components_of_hydraulic_head.
According to your diagram of the manometer, the gauge pressure difference will be (13.6-1)hg (because height h of the manometer has Hg on one side and water on the other), so ##\phi_A-\phi_B= 12.6*0.3m=3.78m##. Thus ##h_A-h_B =\phi_A-\phi_B+z_A-z_B=3.78m+(-2m)=1.78m##.
This makes sense intuitively. As you can see in the diagram at the link, the hydraulic head is effectively the backpressure from the water flow (drag). In the present case the water is flowing up. The pressure required to make it do so (3.78m head) is the pressure required to overcome the height difference (2m head) plus the drag. So the drag is 1.78m head.
Of course, all this depends on that linked diagram being a correct representation of these pressures. I haven't found any other link which expresses it in a way I consider unambiguous.
I didn't get 5.22m by any means. I mentioned .22 because, having calculated 3.78 for gauge pressure difference, if a later part of the calculation required you to subtract that from a larger whole number of metres you would end up with .22 as the decimal part.