What is the point in calculating orthonormal bases for R3

  • Thread starter Thread starter seand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bases Point
seand
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm just learning linear algebra, where we are taking a set of basis vectors and then using gram schmidt to convert them to an orthonormal basis.

So I know I can do it. I know orthonormal is great. But as I'm modifying the basis anyway from the original, why don't I just forget the original basis and just use (0,0,1) (1,0,0) (0,1,0) and be done with it.


Is some useful information being preserved from the original basis into the orthonormal basis? I'm looking for some motivation for this process.

Thanks,

Sean
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first reason that leaps to my mind is that there are other inner product spaces than Rn with its standard inner product.

I could imagine, though, a situation where I would want my first basis vector to be a specific vector, and the next basis vector to lie in a specific plane, and so forth.
 
An orthonormal basis formed using the Gram Shmidt process has a useful property. If your original basis is used as column vectors to form a matrix A, and the GS derived orthonormal basis are the column vectors of the matrix Q, then QT A = R. R happens to be a nice upper triangular matrix. So, I guess there is some useful information preserved when using the GS process because I can recover my original basis using A = QR.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top