What Is the Position Operator if Momentum Is Given by a Specific Operator?

kemiisto
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the operator for position x if the operator for momentum p is taken to be \left(\hbar/2m\right)^{1/2}\left(A + B\right), with \left[A,B\right] = 1 and all other commutators zero.

Homework Equations


Canonical commutation relation
\left [ \hat{ x }, \hat{ p } \right ] = \hat{x} \hat{p} - \hat{p} \hat{x} = i \hbar

The Attempt at a Solution


Using c = \left(\hbar/2m\right)^{1/2}
\hat{x} \hat{p} f - \hat{p} \hat{x} f = i \hbar
\hat{x} c \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) f - c \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) \hat{x} f = i \hbar
c \hat{x} \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) f - c \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) \hat{x} f = i \hbar
\hat{x} \hat{A} f + \hat{x} \hat{B} f - \hat{A} \hat{x} f - \hat{B} \hat{x} f = i \hbar / c
\hat{x} \hat{A} f - c \hat{A} \hat{x} f + \hat{x} \hat{B} f - \hat{B} \hat{x} f = i \hbar / c
\left [ \hat{x}, \hat{A} \right ] + \left [ \hat{x}, \hat{B} \right ] = i \hbar / c
"all other commutators zero"
0 + 0 = i \hbar / c

:confused:

Problem 1.2 from http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199274987/" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If [A,B]=1, then what will be the commutator of A with A+B? Can you go from there?

P.S. Your "f" on the left hand side is unnecessary.
 
If [A, B] = 1 then [A, A + B] = 1

[A, A + B] = A(A + B) - (A + B)A = AA + AB - AA - BA = AB - BA = [A, B] = 1

We have p = c(A + B) and [x, p] = iħ.

xp - px = iħ
cx(A + B) - c(A + B)x = iħ
x(A + B) - (A + B)x = iħ/c | multiply on A from the left
Ax(A + B) - A(A + B)x = iħ/c A | A(A + B) = 1 + (A + B)A
Ax(A + B) - (1 + (A + B)A)x = iħ/c A
Ax(A + B) - x - (A + B)Ax = iħ/c A
[Ax, A + B] - x = iħ/c A
x = -iħ/c A

Checking: [x, p] = xp - px = (-iħ/c A)(c(A + B)) - (c(A + B))(-iħ/c A) = -iħ A(A + B) + iħ (A + B) A = -ih

Ouch! Like always accurate within a sign... :cry:

Anyway, arkajad, many thanks for guiding me. I didn't have enough sleep last night. Maybe tomorrow I'll find the missing sign...
 
Last edited:
Get a sleep and you will have it. But, perhaps, first prove for yourself a very useful identity: for any number a, and any operators A,B,C we have that

[A,B+C]=[A,B]+[A,C]
[A+B,C]=[A,C]+[B,C]
[aA,B]=a[A,B]
[A,aB]=a[A,B]

To save some work use [A,B]=-[B,A] as many times as useful. Once you are done - remember these rules, as they will be handy in the future.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top