What is the predicted de Broglie wavelength of a bullet traveling at 1060 m/s?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeadxBunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    De broglie
DeadxBunny
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bullet of mass 39 g travels at 1060 m/s. Although the bullet is clearly too large to be treated as a matter wave, determine what Eq. 38-13 predicts for the de Broglie wavelength of the bullet at that speed?


Homework Equations


de Broglie equation: wavelength = h / p where h is Planck constant and p is the particle's momentum magnitude.


The Attempt at a Solution


p=sqrt(2*m*K) where K=1/2mv^2. I solved K first and got 21,910,200. Then I solved p and got 41,340. Then I solved for wavelength using the de Broglie eq'n and got 1.604 x 10^-38, but this is not the correct answer. Where did I go wrong?? Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Huh, I'd start by solving for the momentum (3.9 * 10^-2 kg)(1.060 * 10^3 m/s) = 4.134 *10 kg*m/s, then I would recall that p = h/wavelength and solve for the wavelength. It should be a really big number (of the order 10^34 in the mks system).

Good luck.
 
It's 39 grams, not kilograms.

Daniel.
 
Yeah, hence it becomes 3.9 times 10^-2 kilograms.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top