What is the Principle of Least Action?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating the principle of least action using the Lagrangian for a mass in a gravitational field. Participants explore methods to show that the action is minimized for the true motion of the particle, with one suggesting the use of perturbations to the equation of motion. Another participant proposes using calculus of variations to find the function that minimizes the action, although they note a lack of prior instruction in that area. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proving that the action of perturbed motion exceeds that of the true motion. Overall, the thread highlights different approaches to understanding and applying the principle of least action in physics.
HalfManHalfAmazing
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Lagrangian of a mass in a uniform gravitational field can be written as follows: L = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{y}^2 + mgy

Consider all differentiale functions y(t) such that y(t1) = y1 and y(t2) = y2 where y1 and y2 are fixed values. Show that the action is a minimum for the function defining the true motion.


Homework Equations



I believe this simply an 'example' of prooving the principle of least action.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am wondering where to start. I derived the equation of true motion of the particle. Should I know plus in the given Lagrangian to the action integral and then then add a pertubation to the equation of true motion and then plug THAT into the action and show that the action of the perturbed equation of motion must be greater then the action of the original?

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your idea is one way of doing it.

Another way would be to find the function that minimizes the action using calculus of variations, and see that it is the same as the true motion which you derived indepedently.
 
We have not been taught calculus of variations yet, though I may look into that. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top