What is the Probability Distribution Function for Total Rotten Fruit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ouiouiwewe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
ouiouiwewe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Here's a description of the problem:

Suppose we have x apples and y oranges where each apple has a probability pa to rot and each orange has a probability po to rot, then what's the pdf of the total number of fruit z being rotten.

This pdf looks like a product of two binomial distributions on the surface. However, since z = x+y, x >= 0, y >= 0, then it is actually necessary to sum over all combinations of scenarios (i.e. 6 fruit rotten = 3 apples rotten + 3 oranges rotten or 6 fruits rotten = 1 apple rotten + 5 oranges rotten).

By intuition, I worked out the expectation to be x*pa + y *po and it appears to be correct when I manually tested my problem on a spreadsheet. However, I am not quite sure how that expectation can be derived from this messy pdf.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The probability that z fruits will rot, is P(A)^0·P(O)^z+P(A)^1·P(O)^(z-1)+P(A)^2·P(O)^(z-2)+...+P(A)^z·P(O)^0

You could also write that as:
\sum^{z}_{k=0}P(A)^kP(O)^{z-k}
 
Last edited:
This is close to the derivation I had, but instead of P(A)^[something] and P(O)^[something], I had two different binomial distributions. I have no problem getting the pdf, but I have trouble simplifying the expectation.
 
Are you familiar with this division?
(a^n-b^n):(a-b)=a^{n-1}+a^{n-2}b+a^{n-3}b^2+\ldots+b^{n-1}
 
I saw this sum in the derivation of the binomial expectation. Anyhow, this is what I have for the probability of having 2 rotten fruits:

prob of having 2 rotten apples * prob of having 0 rotten oranges
+
prob of having 1 rotten apple * prob of having 1 rotten orange
+
prob of having 0 rotten apples * prob of having 2 rotten oranges

This seems to be the product of two binomial distributions and then summed over all possible combinations.
 
(Ignore my first post, there are errors in it.)

Let's say you have 2 fruits. Then:
-Both fruits can be apples. The probability for those being rotten is P(A)2
-Fruit 1 can be apple, fruit 2 can be orange. The probability for those being rotten is P(A)·P(O)
-Fruit 1 can be orange, fruit 2 can be apple. The probability for those being rotten is P(A)·P(O)
-Both fruits can be oranges. The probability for those being rotten is P(O)2

Since we don't know how many fruits we have, the probability that both the fruits will rot, is the average of the probabilities above, which is:
(P(A)2+2 P(A)·P(O)+P(O)2)/4

The probability that z fruits will be rotten is:
\frac{\binom{z}{0}P(A)^zP(O)^0+\binom{z}{1}P(A)^{z-1}P(O)^1+\binom{z}{2}P(A)^{z-2}P(O)^2+\ldots+\binom{z}{z}P(A)^0P(O)^z}{2^z}

This is exactly the same, but said in a shorter way:
\frac{\sum^{z}_{k=0}\binom{z}{k}P(A)^{z-k}P(O)^k}{2^z}

By using this equation: (a+b)^n=\binom{n}{0}a^nb^0+\binom{n}{1}a^{n-1}b^1+\binom{n}{2}a^{n-2}b^2+\ldots+\binom{n}{n}a^0b^n

We get that:
\frac{\sum^{z}_{k=0}\binom{z}{k}P(A)^{z-k}P(O)^k}{2^z}=\frac{(P(A)+P(O))^z}{2^z}=\left(\frac{P(A)+P(O)}{2}\right)^z
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top