I What is the probability of a cable having a breaking load greater than 6200 N?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter rexxii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of a cable having a breaking load greater than 6200 N, given a normal distribution with a mean of 6000 N and a standard deviation of 155 N. The user correctly calculates the z-value as 1.29 but misinterprets the probability from the statistics table, confusing P(z < 1.290) with P(z > 1.290). The correct interpretation reveals that P(z > 1.290) is actually 0.0985, meaning there is a 9.85% chance that a randomly selected cable will exceed the breaking load of 6200 N. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the areas under the normal distribution curve and the relationship between z-values and probabilities. Clarification on these concepts is necessary for accurate probability calculations.
rexxii
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Probability - z value - stats issue
Hi,

I'm working on a question now where I need to calculate the z value. which I have been able to but I'm calculating a value off the normal distribution that is on the left-hand side of the normal distribution curve and it needs to on the right side. As the value I'm looking into is higher than the mean!

I cannot figure out how I would turn this around. its only one independent event there's no replacement or other variables.

the question is:

A cable manufacturer tests the cables it produces to find the breaking load. Over many years this has been assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 6000 Newtons and standard deviation of 155 Newtons. Calculate the probability that a single cable chosen at random, will have a breaking load greater than 6200 N. Z = 6200 -6000 /155 = 1.29

Then I've written a probability statement (P z>1.290) = P z>1.290)

read from the stats tables that it could be 0.9015.

Said the breaking load is 90.15%

I know this is incorrect please can you advise The probability that a randomly selected cable will have a breaking load greater breaking load than 6200 Newtons is 90%.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rexxii said:
Summary: Probability - z value - stats issue

Hi,

I'm working on a question now where I need to calculate the z value. which I have been able to but I'm calculating a value off the normal distribution that is on the left-hand side of the normal distribution curve and it needs to on the right side. As the value I'm looking into is higher than the mean!

I cannot figure out how I would turn this around. its only one independent event there's no replacement or other variables.

the question is:

A cable manufacturer tests the cables it produces to find the breaking load. Over many years this has been assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 6000 Newtons and standard deviation of 155 Newtons. Calculate the probability that a single cable chosen at random, will have a breaking load greater than 6200 N. Z = 6200 -6000 /155 = 1.29

Then I've written a probability statement (P z>1.290) = P z>1.290)

read from the stats tables that it could be 0.9015.
You're reading the table wrong. The table is giving you P(z < 1.290) = 0.9015. So what would be the probability you want, P(z > 1.290)?
rexxii said:
Said the breaking load is 90.15%

I know this is incorrect please can you advise The probability that a randomly selected cable will have a breaking load greater breaking load than 6200 Newtons is 90%.
 
So i need to read from the RHS side? as it is above the mean? Would i still select that number or a different one of the table?
 
P(z < 1.290) = .9015, from the table. The number .9015 represents the area under the standard normal curve between ##z = -\infty## and z = 1.290. What is the total area under the curve? What's the area under the curve between z = 1.290 and ##z = +\infty##?
 
1.29 - 1 = 0.29 above the mean?
 
rexxii said:
1.29 - 1 = 0.29 above the mean?
No, and this doesn't make any sense -- you're mixing two unrelated things there: the z-value and the probability associated with a certain z-value.

Have you seen a graph of the standard normal curve? In the standard normal distribution, half of the area under the curve is to the left of the mean at z = 0, and the other half is to the right. What's the total area under the curve? How much of the area under the curve lies to the left of z = 1.29? How much of the area lies to the right of z = 1.29?

It would be a good idea to read the section in your textbook that has this problem. There's quite a bit you don't understand.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top