What is the proof for the property of taking the gradient of a function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ohlala191785
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Proof
ohlala191785
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the operation of taking the gradient of a function has the given property. Assume u and v are differentiable functions of x and y and that a and b are constants.

Operation: (∇(u))n = n*un-1*∇u

Homework Equations



The gradient vector of f is <∂f/∂x,∂f/∂y>, where f is a function of x and y (in other words f(x,y)).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried proof by induction, but I have a lot of gaps.

Base, n=1: ∇u = n*u0∇u. But what is u0 if u is a function?

Assume n = k: ∇uk = n*uk-1∇u

For k=k+1, ∇uk+1 = n*uk∇u.

Isn't proof by induction for sums though? I can't seem to identify the sum here.Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ohlala191785 said:

Homework Statement


Show that the operation of taking the gradient of a function has the given property. Assume u and v are differentiable functions of x and y and that a and b are constants.

Operation: (∇(u))n = n*un-1*∇u

Homework Equations



The gradient vector of f is <∂f/∂x,∂f/∂y>, where f is a function of x and y (in other words f(x,y)).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried proof by induction, but I have a lot of gaps.

Base, n=1: ∇u = n*u0∇u. But what is u0 if u is a function?

Assume n = k: ∇uk = n*uk-1∇u

For k=k+1, ∇uk+1 = n*uk∇u.

Isn't proof by induction for sums though? I can't seem to identify the sum here.


Any help would be greatly appreciated!

You have got to mean ## \nabla (u^n)=n u^{n-1} \nabla u ##, ## (\nabla(u))^n ## doesn't mean anything. Just use the chain rule for partial derivatives.
 
Oh I see. Thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top