What is the proof for this property of solutions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the proof of a property related to solutions of the Schrödinger equation, specifically the implications of having both the wave function and its first derivative equal to zero at a point. Participants explore whether this property holds universally for equations of the given form and seek a formal proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the Schrödinger equation and asks for a proof of the claim that if both the wave function and its derivative are zero at a point, then the wave function must be zero everywhere.
  • Another participant interprets the terms "potential value" and "kinetic value" in a way that raises confusion, suggesting a misunderstanding of the concepts involved.
  • A different participant proposes using the "existence and uniqueness" theorem for differential equations to argue that the conditions given lead to a unique solution of zero, but does not provide a direct proof for the specific case at hand.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the applicability of the existence and uniqueness theorem, noting that it does not apply to boundary value problems and questioning the relevance of the vector ODE formulation presented.
  • Concerns are raised about the existence of other functions that satisfy the same initial conditions, suggesting that the proof may not be as straightforward as claimed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof or validity of the claims made. There are competing interpretations of the mathematical concepts involved, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the proof of the property in question.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in the application of theorems to the specific case discussed, noting that the existence and uniqueness theorem may not apply to boundary value conditions. Additionally, there are unresolved questions about the implications of certain mathematical formulations and the existence of alternative solutions.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
The Schrödinger equation is of the form \frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2}+[\varepsilon-v(x)] \psi=0.
In a lecture, the lecturer said that if we have in a point x_0 , \psi(x_0)=\psi'(x_0)=0, then \psi(x)=0.(for a smooth v(x)!)
Can anyone give a proof of this?
Is it only for a equation of the form given above?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm new to this but I'm assuming you're referring to the time-independent non-relativistic equation. Let \psi(x_0) represent a potential value where kinetic is 0. Let \psi'(x_0) represent kinetic value where potential is 0. Iff \psi(x_0) and \psi'(x_0) are two separable wave functions that subscribe to all applicable axioms of \psi(x), \psi will include all potential and kinetic components. A rough analogy could be drawn from binary code. Anyway I hope this helped steer you in the right direction if it did anything at all. Everything I wrote came from a purely logical standpoint.
 
CubicFlunky77 said:
I'm new to this but I'm assuming you're referring to the time-independent non-relativistic equation. Let \psi(x_0) represent a potential value where kinetic is 0. Let \psi'(x_0) represent kinetic value where potential is 0. Iff \psi(x_0) and \psi'(x_0) are two separable wave functions that subscribe to all applicable axioms of \psi(x), \psi will include all potential and kinetic components. A rough analogy could be drawn from binary code. Anyway I hope this helped steer you in the right direction if it did anything at all. Everything I wrote came from a purely logical standpoint.

I don't understand what you mean by "potential value" and "kinetic value"!
And...\psi(x_0) and \psi'(x_0) are two complex numbers. Not wave functions!
What do you mean by binary code?
 
This can be proved by an application of the basic "existence and uniqueness" theorem for differential equations: "If \phi(x,t) is continuous in both x and t and differentiable with respect to x in some neighborhood of (t_0, x_0) then there exist a unique function x(t) satisfying dx/dt= \phi(x, t) and x(t_0)= x_0."

That can be extended to second (and higher) order equation by writing d^2\phi/dt^2= F(t,\phi, \phi') as dx/dt= F(x, t) by taking x to be the vector function x= (x_1, x_2)= (\phi, d\phi/dt). Then d^2\phi/dt^2= dx_2/dt and of course, dx_1/dt= d\phi/dt= x_2 so that the differential equation becomes the vector equation (dx_1/dt, dx_2/dt)= (x_2, F(t, x_1, x_2)).

The "initial value conditions", \phi(x_0)= 0 and \phi'(x_0)= 0 becomes the single vector condition x(0)= (x_1(0), x_2(0))= 0.

Obviously \phi(t)= 0 is a solution to the given differential equation and obviously \phi(0)= \phi'(0)= 0. The "existence and uniqueness theorem" tells us that this is the only solution.

(This theorem does NOT apply to "boundary value conditions" since we cannot create the single vector condition. The differential equation d^2\phi/dt^2= -\phi has NO solution that satisfies \phi(0)= 0, \phi(\pi/2)= 0 but has an infinite number of solutions that satisfy \phi(0)= 0, \phi(\pi)= 0.)
 
HallsofIvy said:
This can be proved by an application of the basic "existence and uniqueness" theorem for differential equations: "If \phi(x,t) is continuous in both x and t and differentiable with respect to x in some neighborhood of (t_0, x_0) then there exist a unique function x(t) satisfying dx/dt= \phi(x, t) and x(t_0)= x_0."

That can be extended to second (and higher) order equation by writing d^2\phi/dt^2= F(t,\phi, \phi') as dx/dt= F(x, t) by taking x to be the vector function x= (x_1, x_2)= (\phi, d\phi/dt). Then d^2\phi/dt^2= dx_2/dt and of course, dx_1/dt= d\phi/dt= x_2 so that the differential equation becomes the vector equation (dx_1/dt, dx_2/dt)= (x_2, F(t, x_1, x_2)).

The "initial value conditions", \phi(x_0)= 0 and \phi'(x_0)= 0 becomes the single vector condition x(0)= (x_1(0), x_2(0))= 0.

Obviously \phi(t)= 0 is a solution to the given differential equation and obviously \phi(0)= \phi'(0)= 0. The "existence and uniqueness theorem" tells us that this is the only solution.

(This theorem does NOT apply to "boundary value conditions" since we cannot create the single vector condition. The differential equation d^2\phi/dt^2= -\phi has NO solution that satisfies \phi(0)= 0, \phi(\pi/2)= 0 but has an infinite number of solutions that satisfy \phi(0)= 0, \phi(\pi)= 0.)

I don't understand.
The vector ODE you mentioned can also be written as \frac{d^2 x_1}{dt^2}=F(t,x_1,\frac{dx_1}{dt}). This is again a second order ODE and instead of helping us, just gets us back to the main question. I don't see a proof!
Another problem is, the function y=x^3 is the answer to the 2nd order ODE \frac{d^2 y}{dx^2}-6 \frac{y}{x^2}=0 and also satisfies y(0)=y'(0)=0. Yeah, you may say F has a singularity but you may instead consider the trivial ODE y''=6x!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K