What is the proof that x, x^2, x^3 form a basis of V?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TranscendArcu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bases Subspaces
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
9 replies · 3K views
TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/5586/screenshot20120121at328.png

The Attempt at a Solution


I propose the vectors [itex]x,x^2,x^3[/itex] form a basis of V. To test for linear independence, let [itex]0 = a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3[/itex], where [itex]a \in R[/itex]. A polynomial is 0 iff all of its coefficients are zero. Thus, linear independence is proved. That is, [itex]a_1 = a_2 = a_3 = 0[/itex]

To prove that [itex]x,x^2,x^3[/itex] spans V, let [itex]p(x) = b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3 \in V[/itex], where [itex]b \in R[/itex]. We need numbers [itex]c_1,c_2,c_3[/itex] such that [itex]b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3 = c_1 x + c_2 x^2 + c_3 x^3[/itex]. This implies [itex]b_1 = c_1[/itex], [itex]b_2 = c_2[/itex], [itex]b_3 = c_3[/itex]. Thus, [itex]p(x) = c_1 x + c_2 x^2 + c_3 x^3[/itex] and clearly [itex]p(0) = c_1 (0) + c_2 (0) + c_3 (0) = 0[/itex]. Therefore, [itex]x,x^2,x^3[/itex] span V.

Am I doing this right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the second part of the question:

http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/9069/screenshot20120121at350.png

I began with [itex]\int \frac{d}{dx} p(x) dx = 0x + c_1[/itex], where [itex]c_1 \in R[/itex]. Thus, I reasoned that p(x) must be of the form: [itex]c_1 + 0(x) + 0(x^2) + 0(x^3)[/itex]. A polynomial is zero iff all of its coefficients are zero. [itex]c_1[/itex] must necessarily equal zero in order for the zero vector to result. Thus, linear independence is proven. To show that [itex]c_1[/itex] spans S, let [itex]p(x) = b_1 + 0(x) + 0(x^2) + 0(x^3) \in S[/itex], where [itex]b_1 \in R[/itex]. We need [itex]p(x) = b_1 = c_1[/itex]. This implies [itex]b_1 = c_1[/itex]. So [itex]p(x) = c_1[/itex] and clearly [itex]\frac{d}{dx} p(x) =\frac{d}{dx} c_1 = 0[/itex]. Thus, [itex]c_1[/itex] spans S.

Man, I don't think I'm doing these right...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TranscendArcu said:

Homework Statement



http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/5586/screenshot20120121at328.png

The Attempt at a Solution


I propose the vectors [itex]x,x^2,x^3[/itex] form a basis of V. To test for linear independence, let [itex]0 = a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3[/itex], where [itex]a \in R[/itex]. A polynomial is 0 iff all of its coefficients are zero. Thus, linear independence is proved. That is, [itex]a_1 = a_2 = a_3 = 0[/itex]

To prove that [itex]x,x^2,x^3[/itex] spans V, let [itex]p(x) = b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3 \in V[/itex], where [itex]b \in R[/itex]. We need numbers [itex]c_1,c_2,c_3[/itex] such that [itex]b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3 = c_1 x + c_2 x^2 + c_3 x^3[/itex]. This implies [itex]b_1 = c_1[/itex], [itex]b_2 = c_2[/itex], [itex]b_3 = c_3[/itex]. Thus, [itex]p(x) = c_1 x + c_2 x^2 + c_3 x^3[/itex] and clearly [itex]p(0) = c_1 (0) + c_2 (0) + c_3 (0) = 0[/itex]. Therefore, [itex]x,x^2,x^3[/itex] span V.

Am I doing this right?
In the second part, you can't assume p(x) has the form ##b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3## right off, otherwise you're assuming what you're trying to prove. When you say ##p(x) \in V##, you know that p is a polynomial and that p(0)=0. From what you know about polynomials, you should be able deduce that p(x) has the form required, from which it follows that p(x) is in the span of {x, x2, x3}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay. Can I assume that p(x) has the form [itex]b_0 +b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3[/itex]? But, clearly p(0) cannot equal zero unless [itex]b_0 = 0[/itex], which immediately gets us to the required form.

Is that better?
 
Yes, that's fine. Because you know V is a subspace of P3 and presumably you know that {1, x, x2, x3} is a basis for P3, you can write p(x) in that form.
 
This is the last problem. I need only find a basis.

http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/7183/screenshot20120121at517.png

I propose that the vectors [itex]1,x^2[/itex] form a basis for W. To prove linear independence, we write, [itex]0 = a_0 + a_2 x^2[/itex] where [itex]a \in R[/itex]. A polynomial is zero iff all coefficients equal zero. To prove that [itex]1,x^2[/itex] span W let [itex]p(x) = b_0 + b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3[/itex], but [itex]b_1 = b_3 = 0[/itex] otherwise condition fails. We need numbers [itex]c_0, c_2[/itex] such that [itex]b_0 +b_2 x^2 = c_0 +c_2 x^2[/itex]. This implies that [itex]b_0 = c_0[/itex] and [itex]b_2 = c_2[/itex]. Thus [itex]p(x) = c_0 + c_2 x^2[/itex] in which case [itex]\forall x[/itex] [itex]p(x) = p(-x)[/itex], as desired. Thus [itex]1,x^2[/itex] form a basis for W.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TranscendArcu said:
This is the last problem. I need only find a basis.

http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/7183/screenshot20120121at517.png

I propose that the vectors [itex]1,x^2[/itex] form a basis for W. To prove linear independence, we write, [itex]0 = a_0 + a_2 x^2[/itex] where [itex]a \in R[/itex]. A polynomial is zero iff all coefficients equal zero. To prove that [itex]1,x^2[/itex] span W let [itex]p(x) = b_0 + b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3[/itex], but [itex]b_1 = b_3 = 0[/itex] otherwise condition fails.
You should go into more detail about why you must have b1=b3=0.

We need numbers [itex]c_0, c_2[/itex] such that [itex]b_0 +b_2 x^2 = c_0 +c_2 x^2[/itex]. This implies that [itex]b_0 = c_0[/itex] and [itex]b_2 = c_2[/itex]. Thus [itex]p(x) = c_0 + c_2 x^2[/itex] in which case [itex]\forall x[/itex] [itex]p(x) = p(-x)[/itex], as desired. Thus [itex]1,x^2[/itex] form a basis for W.
This part is unnecessary. After you show that b1=b3=0, you know that p(x)=b0+b2x2. Since it's a linear combination of 1 and x2, it's in the span of {1, x2}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Should I say something like:

If [itex]p(x) = p(-x)[/itex] then it follows that all of the n-degree components of p(x) should be equal to their respective n-degree components of p(-x). However, clearly this can't be so since x ≠ -x (in the first degree) and (x)3 ≠ (-x)3 (in the third degree). Thus, in order to preserve the equality of the condition, it is necessary to zero these terms.

?
 
TranscendArcu said:
This is the second part of the question:

http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/9069/screenshot20120121at350.png

I began with [itex]\int \frac{d}{dx} p(x) dx = 0x + c_1[/itex], where [itex]c_1 \in R[/itex]. Thus, I reasoned that p(x) must be of the form: [itex]c_1 + 0(x) + 0(x^2) + 0(x^3)[/itex]. A polynomial is zero iff all of its coefficients are zero. [itex]c_1[/itex] must necessarily equal zero in order for the zero vector to result. Thus, linear independence is proven. To show that [itex]c_1[/itex] spans S, let [itex]p(x) = b_1 + 0(x) + 0(x^2) + 0(x^3) \in S[/itex], where [itex]b_1 \in R[/itex]. We need [itex]p(x) = b_1 = c_1[/itex]. This implies [itex]b_1 = c_1[/itex]. So [itex]p(x) = c_1[/itex] and clearly [itex]\frac{d}{dx} p(x) =\frac{d}{dx} c_1 = 0[/itex]. Thus, [itex]c_1[/itex] spans S.
You made a slight error. You showed that p(x)∈S has the form p(x)=c1. The basis vector is 1, not c1, i.e. p(x) = c11. You want to show the vector 1 spans S, not c1 as you said.

Since you've already shown that p(x)∈S implies p(x)=c1=c11, you're done because you've shown that p(x) can be written as a linear combination of the set of vectors {1}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TranscendArcu said:
Should I say something like:

If [itex]p(x) = p(-x)[/itex] then it follows that all of the n-degree components of p(x) should be equal to their respective n-degree components of p(-x). However, clearly this can't be so since x ≠ -x (in the first degree) and (x)3 = (-x)3 (in the third degree). Thus, in order to preserve the equality of the condition, it is necessary to zero these terms.

?
It would be more straightforward to let ##p(x) = b_0 + b_1 x + b_2 x^2 + b_3 x^3## and calculate g(x)=p(x)-p(-x). Then show that g(x)=0 implies b1=b3=0.