What is the Ratio of y/x for Zero Net Electric Force on a Charge?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the ratio of y/x for zero net electric force on a center charge with three positive point charges, the equation K(2q/x^2) - K(3q/y^2) = 0 is established using Coulomb's Law. However, without specific values for the charges, calculating an exact number for y/x is not feasible. The discussion suggests that one can test the provided answer choices to find which one satisfies the equation. Ultimately, the solution hinges on either knowing the charge values or testing the options against the established equation. This approach can help identify the correct ratio for the problem.
compute_a_nerd
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I am kindof stuck on this problem. It asks: The figure below shows three point charges all posotive. If the net electric force on the center charge is zero, what is the value of y/x.
The answers:
a) 4/9
b) \sqrt{2/3}
c) \sqrt{3/2}
d) 3/2
e) 9/4

This is my figuring:

K\frac{2q}{x^2} - K\frac{3q}{y^2} = 0

But how can I get an actual number without a value for q?
Thanks
Chris
 

Attachments

  • pic.JPG
    pic.JPG
    4.2 KB · Views: 411
Physics news on Phys.org
You can divide the whole equation through \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}\epsilon_{r}}=:K and "q" and then try to see which numbers fit the equation left...

Daniel.
 


Hi Chris,

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the problem. It seems like you have already set up the correct equation using Coulomb's Law to find the net electric force on the center charge. However, you are correct that without a specific value for the charges, it is not possible to calculate the value of y/x. This is because the value of y/x would depend on the specific values of the charges.

If you have access to the specific values of the charges, you can plug them into the equation you have set up and solve for y/x. Otherwise, you can use the given answer choices and plug them in to see which one satisfies the equation.

I hope this helps. Good luck with solving the problem!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top