What is the Relation Between k and x in the Given Energy Function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between the wave vector k and the position variable x in the context of a given energy function. The energy function includes terms dependent on k_x, which relates to the momentum in the x-direction, and E_0, which is a constant based on physical parameters. The user has attempted to Fourier transform the energy function to analyze it in momentum space but finds the resulting delta functions confusing. They are considering the possibility of plotting a constant for a chosen k value but feel this approach lacks depth. Clarifying the connection between k and x is essential for accurately plotting the energy function within the specified range.
dikmikkel
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have an energy function as follows:
E = \dfrac{\hbar^2}{2m_e}k_x^2+E_0\left(n_y^2+1\right)
Where E_0 = \dfrac{\pi^2\hbar^2}{2m_eL_z}
I am asked to plot this energy for x\in ]-L_z/2;L_z/2[
I know everything but not the relation between k and x?.

The Attempt at a Solution


I Fourier transform the energy from x to k-space(momentum space) and get some dela functions in k multiplied on as one would expect, but this seems odd to me and I want to know:
What is the relation between k and x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Follow up:
Maybe I shall choose some k and just plot a constant, but it seems silly.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top