I What is the relation between Temperature and Quantum State?

jonjacson
Messages
450
Reaction score
38
Hi folks,

Let's pick a simple example, the H atom. We can calculate all spherical armonics, all quantum numbers so we are able to know which are all the possible states of the electron. We know all the values this observables can take. But the question is, let's say we have a handbook of properties from Hydrogen and we find that at temperature T, the electrical conductivity is X. What is the corresponding state of the atom at that temperature?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what you are after. Temperature makes sense in thermal equilibrium only, and this is described by the grand canonical ensemble, i.e., the state
$$\hat{\rho}=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}), \quad Z=\mathrm{Tr} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}),$$
where ##\hat{H}## is the Hamiltonian of the (many-body) system. That's the relation between temperature ##T=1/\beta## (in natural units, where ##k_{\text{B}}=1##) and the state, reprsented by the grand-canonical statistical operator.
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
vanhees71 said:
I don't understand what you are after. Temperature makes sense in thermal equilibrium only, and this is described by the grand canonical ensemble, i.e., the state
$$\hat{\rho}=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}), \quad Z=\mathrm{Tr} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}),$$
where ##\hat{H}## is the Hamiltonian of the (many-body) system. That's the relation between temperature ##T=1/\beta## (in natural units, where ##k_{\text{B}}=1##) and the state, reprsented by the grand-canonical statistical operator.

Thanks for your answer.

I have found a related thread, I apologize for that:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/relation-between-quantum-mechanics-and-temperature.426455/

Well what I wanted to understand is Superconductivity. We have a solid, and we know at certain temperature it goes to superconductor mode and energy loss for the current is 0. But I wanted to understand what it means from the quantum point of view. Since temperature is not a quantum magnitude I wanted to know how it relates to quantum mechanics.

In superconductivity you have a solid, you have its behavior under different temperatures regarding its electric conductivity. Do you know if there is any theory that tells you at what temperature the solid goes to superconductivity mode?

I mean, if I give you as an input a unit Bravais cell, Would you be able to tell me the temperature for superconductivity?
 
Look for "BCS theory" which describes superconductivity quantum(-field) theoretically. A very good book about superfluidity and superconductivity is

A. Schmitt, Indroduction to Superfluidity, Springer (2015)
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
vanhees71 said:
Look for "BCS theory" which describes superconductivity quantum(-field) theoretically. A very good book about superfluidity and superconductivity is

A. Schmitt, Indroduction to Superfluidity, Springer (2015)

THanks, I will do.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top