What is the relationship between electric force and distance between particles?

AI Thread Summary
The electric force between two charged particles is inversely proportional to the square of the distance separating them and directly proportional to the product of their charges. This means that as the distance increases, the force decreases significantly, while an increase in either charge results in a stronger force. The formula for calculating this force is F = (K * q1 * q2) / r^2, where K is a constant. Understanding this relationship helps clarify how electric forces operate in various scenarios. Overall, the electric force is crucial in understanding interactions between charged particles.
mooneh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
- the electric force is inversely proportional to the square of the separation r between the particles and directed along the line joining them.

- is proportional to the product of the charges q1 and q2 on the two particles.


i don't understand wut does that mean, can someone please explains it to me n simple terms
thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What specific words are you having trouble with? Start at the beginning of the first statement and tell us where you first start to have trouble.
 
F = (K * q1 * q1)/r^2

K = 9 * 10^9 N m^2/c^2 (for vacuum and air)

If q1 and/or q2 increase, force is too
if r increase, force decreases

--------------------- example 1
q1 = 1 c
q2 = 1 c
r = 1 m

F= (9 * 10^9 * 1 * 1)/1^2 = 9 * 10^9

------------------- example 2
q1 = 2 c
q2 = 1 c
r = 1 m

F= (9 * 10^9 * 1 * 2)/1^2 = 9 * 10^9 * 2

--------------------- example 3

q1 = 1 c
q2 = 1 c
r = 2 m

F= (9 * 10^9 * 1 * 1)/2^2 = (9 * 10^9)/4
 
Last edited:
mooneh said:
- the electric force is inversely proportional to the square of the separation r between the particles and directed along the line joining them.

- is proportional to the product of the charges q1 and q2 on the two particles.


i don't understand wut does that mean, can someone please explains it to me n simple terms
thx
(1) There is something called electric force which only exists when electric charges are under consideration. With no electric charges there is no electric force and to have an electric force one must first procure electric charges.

(2) It was found that an electric force exists minimally betwen two electric charges which we can conveniently call q1 and q2. The letter "q" usually connotes electric charge.

(3) When we place two charges next to each other, it was found that one principal factor that affected the electric force, was the relation between the two charges: q1*q2, and not q1 + q2, or q1 - q2, or q1/q2. The size of the electric force varies directly with the quantity of electric charges.

(4) To find whether this electric force is local or non-local, experiments were performed which eventually localized the electric force to be in the immediate vicinity of the electric charges. Everytime the charges q1 and q2 were placed a distance, r apart and the force F calculated, it was found the electric force diminished, the further the charges were apart, and conversely, the closer the charges were together the greater the electric force became. However the electric force varied not with 2r, r-1, or 1/r, but with 1/r*r. This is called an inverse proportionality (1/X) as opposed to a direct proportionality (X).

(5) The electric force F is proportional to q1*q2/r * r. This number gives a local value per area between the charges, which is directly proportional to the electric force.
 
mooneh said:
- the electric force is inversely proportional to the square of the separation r between the particles and directed along the line joining them.

- is proportional to the product of the charges q1 and q2 on the two particles.

i don't understand wut does that mean, can someone please explains it to me n simple terms
thx

"inversely" means "1/…"
"separation" means distance
So altogether it's:
:smile: Force = (constant x q1 x q2)/distance-squared. :smile:
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top