What is the relationship between energy and speed in a Schwarzschild geometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephenmitten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Formula Gr
stephenmitten
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a stationary observer throws a rock out in the radial direction in a Schwarzschild geometry, what is the relationship between the energy of the rock and its speed in the observer's frame?

I'm a bit confused because the book seems to say it's E = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1-V^2}}, but I thought that only applied to inertial frames in special relativity.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That formula only makes sense if it is assumed that c=1, otherwise it could be written

E = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-V^2/c^2}}

which I don't recognise. Over to someone else.
 
If, with respect to an orthonormal frame on the observer's worldline, the rock has speed V on release, then, at release and with respect to this frame, the total energy of the rock is given by the same expression as in special relativity.
 
Thanks for the replies.

Is that because at release the positions of the observer and the rock coincide and since the spacetime is tangentially flat, the formula applies as in special relativity?

So is it true that if the rock's position was different from the observer's, the formula wouldn't apply?
 
Can someone tell me why the formula applies in this situation?
 
If, with respect to an orthonormal frame on the observer's worldline, the rock has speed LaTeX Code: V on release, then, at release and with respect to this frame, the total energy of the rock is given by the same expression as in special relativity.
Is that because at release the positions of the observer and the rock coincide and since the spacetime is tangentially flat, the formula applies as in special relativity?
Yes.
"Energy", especially "potential Energy" is a bit tricky, because for the latter there is not always a straightforward definition in GR.
So if you use local standards to measure the velocity of the stone, said formula holds. Energy is not conserved because you use a different frame for every point of the stone's worldline.
If you use a single (static) frame, like the Schwarzschild metric, there is a conserved quantity which one can identif with energy. If E_{kin} is the kinetic energy as defined above, E_{kin}\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}} is the total energy, a constant.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top