What is the relationship between fluid pressure and the Venturi effect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between fluid pressure and the Venturi effect, emphasizing that fluid pressure decreases in a constriction despite an increase in fluid velocity. This occurs because, according to Bernoulli's principle, as the kinetic energy of the fluid increases, the static pressure decreases to maintain constant energy per unit volume. The confusion arises from the misconception that a smaller volume leads to higher pressure; instead, the flow rate remains constant, leading to faster fluid movement through narrower sections. The participants seek a clear explanation of these dynamics, reinforcing the importance of understanding energy conservation in fluid mechanics. Overall, the Venturi effect illustrates how fluid behavior is governed by the interplay of pressure and velocity.
Metals
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
So I recently looked into the venturi effect, only to be confused. I had always been aware that a lower available volume would result in a higher pressure, yet I had read that fluid passing through a constriction is actually subjected to less pressure than the diverging sides of a pipe. I had thought that the increase in fluid velocity was due to an increase in pressure (from a smaller volume).

Why is there less fluid pressure in a constriction as opposed to a section of a tube with a larger volume?

Is the decrease in pressure from the constriction the reason why fluid flows faster through it? I thought fluid went faster because it had to maintain the same volume/time ratio through a smaller volume, which should result in a higher pressure (force/volume=pressure).

I'd appreciate a clear answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the simplified case, no compression occurs, mass flow is constant throughout the venturi, and no external forces act on the fluid, so the total energy per unit volume of the gas or fluid remains constant. If the kinetic energy per unit volume increases due to an increase in speed, then the static pressure (energy per unit volume) decreases.

Wiki links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venturi_effect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle

There is a frame invariant form of Bernoulli, which is described in this pdf file:

http://www.loreto.unican.es/Carpeta2012/EJP%28Mungan%29Bernoulli%282011%29.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top