What is the relationship between light rays and the equations of motion in GR?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lalbatros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Light Rays
lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
Hello,

Would you know a reference showing and deriving the equations of light rays in GR.
I would like to read that as well as to compare that to the equations of motion of test particles in a gravitaional field.

Thanks,

Michel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lalbatros, how is this?
 
Idealized test particles, with no effect on an ambient gravitational field, follow null geodesics...actual light, that is photons, have some energy, so in fact they deviate slightly from geodesics in the real world...so a more energetic photon will follow a slightly different path than a low energy photon.
 
Naty1 said:
Idealized test particles, with no effect on an ambient gravitational field, follow null geodesics...actual light, that is photons, have some energy, so in fact they deviate slightly from geodesics in the real world...so a more energetic photon will follow a slightly different path than a low energy photon.

Although this may be true as a theoretical limit, any such deviation is so tiny that I don't know of any way for it to have a measurable effect in our universe. We know for example that photons with a wide range of energies from a distant supernova arrive with indistinguishable speed and direction, and even when there is some variation in propagation of photons, it is clearly due to (electromagnetic) interactions with other matter in space rather than gravitational effects.

The normal assumption in GR is that anything whose gravitational effect is negligible compared with that of the source of the field can be treated as a test particle. If you compare the energy of a typical photon with that of a typical gravitational source it should be obvious that this assumption holds in such cases by many orders of magnitude.
 
Naty1 said:
Idealized test particles, with no effect on an ambient gravitational field, follow null geodesics...actual light, that is photons, have some energy, so in fact they deviate slightly from geodesics in the real world...so a more energetic photon will follow a slightly different path than a low energy photon.
As Jonathan said, any such effect would be extremely difficult to detect. Additionally the equivalence principle suggests that locally and ignoring tidal effects that photons of all energies follow identical paths, because in the reference frame of a free falling lab, all photons from the same location follow an identical straight path no matter what their energy is.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top