What is the relationship between SO(n) and S^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Rotations
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Group of rotations of S^1 = SO(2)=S^1 conincidently
Group of rotations of S^2 = SO(3)
Group of rotations of S^3 = SO(4)

Correct?

The Attempt at a Solution


SO(3) is the group of all rotations in R^3 so it can rotate all elements of S^2 which is part of R^3. Although I can't show it rigorously.

Would it be enough to say since SO(3) consists of all rotations in R^3, it can offcouse rotate all elements having unit distance from the origin.

Similar argument made to S^1 and S^3.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pivoxa15 said:

Homework Statement


Group of rotations of S^1 = SO(2)=S^1 conincidently
Group of rotations of S^2 = SO(3)
Group of rotations of S^3 = SO(4)

Correct?

No, the last two are not correct.

S^2 \cong SO \left( 3 \right) / SO \left( 2 \right)

S^3 \cong SO \left( 4 \right) / SO \left( 3 \right) \cong SU \left( 2 \right)

In general,

S^n \cong SO \left( n+1 \right) / SO \left( n \right)

S^{2n + 1} \cong SU \left( n+1 \right) / SU \left( n \right).

[edit] Sorry, I think I misunderstood what you wrote. Note that "=" should not be substituted for the word "is."

I think what you meant is something like the following.

Consider S^n as a subset of \mathbb{R}^{n+1}. Show that each element of SO \left( n+1 \right) maps S^n to S^n. A general mapping from \mathbb{R}^{n+1} to \mathbb{R}^{n+1} might map an element of S^n to an element of \mathbb{R}^{n+1} that is not in S^n, so there is something "special" going on here.[/edit]
 
Last edited:
Continuing, let x be an element of S^n, so x is an element of \mathbb{R}^{n+1} such that

x^T x = 1.

Set y = Ax, with A in SO \left( n+1 \right), and calculate the length of y.
 
George Jones said:
No, the last two are not correct.

S^2 \cong SO \left( 3 \right) / SO \left( 2 \right)

S^3 \cong SO \left( 4 \right) / SO \left( 3 \right) \cong SU \left( 2 \right)

In general,

S^n \cong SO \left( n+1 \right) / SO \left( n \right)

S^{2n + 1} \cong SU \left( n+1 \right) / SU \left( n \right).

[edit] Sorry, I think I misunderstood what you wrote. Note that "=" should not be substituted for the word "is."

I think what you meant is something like the following.

Consider S^n as a subset of \mathbb{R}^{n+1}. Show that each element of SO \left( n+1 \right) maps S^n to S^n. A general mapping from \mathbb{R}^{n+1} to \mathbb{R}^{n+1} might map an element of S^n to an element of \mathbb{R}^{n+1} that is not in S^n, so there is something "special" going on here.[/edit]


With this one, S^{2n + 1} \cong SU \left( n+1 \right) / SU \left( n \right).

does it mean each coset representation is a matrix in SU(2)?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top