What is the relationship between the acceleration and the angle of the slope?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the kinetic friction and acceleration of a block sliding down an inclined plane using available equipment. Participants explore whether it's possible to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction (Uk) without knowing the mass of the blocks. It is clarified that mass cancels out in the equations, allowing the use of acceleration, angle, and gravitational force to find Uk. The relationship between the acceleration and the angle of the slope is emphasized through Newton's second law, which helps in understanding the forces acting on the block. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of forces on an inclined plane to solve the problem effectively.
Ocis
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


To calculate the kinetic friction of a block of wood and determine its acceleration by timing it as it travels down a slope. The equipment available consists: of a plank of wood, clamps etc. for raising one end of it to give an inclined plane, blocks to slide down the plane, weights which may be attached to the blocks, measuring equipment, and a timer.Can this be achieved without knowing the mass of the blocks? Because despite being allowed to use weights the equipment doesn't mention digital scales...
Known data: height & distance (slope), time, angle(Ө), acceleration. Us (static coe.)

Homework Equations


Us = TanӨ (Ө being angle of slope)
Uk = Ff= P+mgsinӨ (P =Applied Force)
Nf mgCosӨ

The Attempt at a Solution


I have already completed the results to get the Us (static coefficient) = TanӨ . I know that if the weight of the block is doubled so will the frictional force, but I am unsure how the acceleration helps to solve the Uk? Have I missed something? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the case of a block accelerating down the slope, identify the forces acting and apply Newton's 2nd law. (Draw the usual free body diagram.) That might help you understand how measuring the acceleration allows you to calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction.
 
I know that the acceleration is directly proportional to the net force, and that the forces are therefore unbalanced to create an acceleration. I have drawn a f.b.d. but I am struggling to appreciate what good acceleration is without a mass or force to calculate the Uk...? Anymore clues or suggestions would be appreciated..
 
Welcome to PF!

Ocis said:
I have drawn a f.b.d. but I am struggling to appreciate what good acceleration is without a mass or force to calculate the Uk...?

Hi Ocis! Welcome to PF! :smile:

The acceleration perpendicular to the slope is zero, so the normal force is the same as before.

Then just use Newton's second law for forces parallel to the slope.

You don't need to know the mass, because mass will be in all the forces on the left-hand-side, and you should have mass x acceleration on the right-hand-side.

So just divide the whole equation by mass! :biggrin:
 
I would love to say I understand but I am even more confused now... What formula/equation are you referring to exactly. I can appreciate that the normal force is the same but its determining the applied force from just an acceleration? Am I expected to work this out from just having values of acceleration, angle, gravity? Sorry...
 
Ocis said:
What formula/equation are you referring to exactly.

Hi Ocis! :smile:

Total force along the slope = mass x acceleration along the slope.

In other words: mgsinθ - µN = m x acceleration.

So µ = … ? :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top