What is the relationship between the amu and the gram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
AI Thread Summary
The relationship between atomic mass units (amu) and grams is defined by the fact that 1 amu equals 1.66053886 × 10^-24 grams. This conversion stems from the definition of 1 amu as 1/12th the mass of a carbon-12 atom. Additionally, 1 gram of any substance contains approximately 6.022 x 10^23 amu, a concept linked to Avogadro's number. The amu serves as a convenient unit for expressing atomic-scale masses, while grams are used for macroscopic quantities. Understanding this relationship enhances comprehension of atomic and molecular mass in chemistry.
IB
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
The textbook told me that there's a relationship between the amu and the gram, but I fail to see any. Could you please show me? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are both are a measure of mass.

1 atomic mass unit = 1.66053886 × 10-27 kilograms = 1.66053886 × 10-24 grams. You can look this value up in books/online pages.

You can derive it by realizing that 1 amu is defined as 1/12th the mass of a C-12 atom.
 
Last edited:
dav2008 said:
They are both are a measure of mass.

1 atomic mass unit = 1.66053886 × 10-27 kilograms

But how is 1g of anything = 6.022 X 10^23 amu

Isn't 1 amu = 1/12 Carbon-12 so therefore 6.022 X 10^23 amu = 6.022 X 10^23 amu / 12 Carbon-12 ?

I'm quite confused. Where did chemists get 1g of anything = 6.022 X 10^23 amu. :confused:
 
A lot of things are defined in respect to very specific situations. For example, the second is defined as "9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom". The meter is defined as "the length of the path traveled by light in absolute vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second".

That doesn't mean that we are restricted to using seconds only when talking about cesium atoms, or using meters only when talking about how far light travels.

The amu is just a convenient unit to use when talking about things with mass on the scale of atoms. (And those things are typically atoms)
 
Last edited:
It's somewhat convenient, the relation between grams to amu that is, in the sense that the value in amu of a particular atom/compound is pretty much the same with the mass of a mole of that atom/compound. Thus reading up on the history of moles, and why it was created, should add some excitement to this matter, that of the relationship between the mass of an individual atom/compound with that of a sample. The whole thing was somewhat devised, that is they were seeking for such a method of gravimetric analysis, and that's why the "mole" is so special.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top