B What is the relative speed of two groups of quasars with different redshifts?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the relative speed of two groups of quasars with different redshifts, specifically redshift 10 and redshift 6. The redshift 10 group is considered "at rest," while the redshift 6 group is moving towards us. To determine the speed of the second group, it is suggested to calculate the redshift from motion while assuming both groups are at the same distance. The complexity arises from the non-linear nature of space, which means a unique result cannot be obtained, but a minimal velocity can be calculated using the Doppler shift formula. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between redshift, motion, and the implications of cosmological redshift as time dilation.
CosmologyHobbyist
Messages
61
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
speed calculation between two groups at different redshifts : redshift 10 & redshift 6.
If many quasars are at redshift 10, and another group is at redshift 6, what is the speed of the second group relative to the first? The redshift 10 group can be considered "at rest", so the redshift 6 group is heading in our direction at what rate? For this scenario, let us assume all the quasars are at same distance (as suggested by zero time dilation difference). Answer in percent of lightspeed please, but kilometers per second is ok, I can handle that conversion.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Cosmological redshift is effectively time dilation. You are asking for two mutually exclusive conditions at the same time. But if you want to put them at the same distance: Calculate the redshift from motion at this place (the relative frequencies stay the same), then plug that into the Doppler shift formula. You won't get a unique result because space is not one-dimensional, but you can get a minimal velocity.
 
Thanks for your time, mfb.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top