What Is the Required Cross-Section for Equipotential Link Conductors Above 250A?

AI Thread Summary
For equipotential link conductors above 250A, the minimum cross-section should be no less than half the cross-sectional area of the phase conductors, as indicated in IEC standards. When exposed conductive parts lack fixed devices, a conductor with a minimum cross-section of 2.5 mm² is required. Additional resources, including a 2016 Webinar and specifications for large installations like the ATACAMA Radio Telescope, provide further guidance on grounding standards. These documents emphasize the importance of adhering to established standards for safety and compliance. Understanding these requirements is crucial for proper electrical installation and maintenance.
Ivan001
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
When the exposed conductive parts (door, protective screen, closing panel, etc.) do not have any devices or equipment fixed on them, the equipotential connection of these exposed conductive parts must be provided using a conductor, minimum cross-section 2.5 mm² as it's stated in IEC (see picture). But, what is with the cross section for currents above 250A?
 

Attachments

  • Link.PNG
    Link.PNG
    6.2 KB · Views: 255
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here is a slide show (PDF format) from a 2016 Webinar on Grounding per IEC and NEC. Grounding starts on slide 38. A quick look points to the Grounding conductor being no less than 1/2 the cross sectional area of the Phase conductors.

https://ias.ieee.org/images/files/W...IEC/Presentation_slides_understanding_NEC.pdf
And here are the requirements for a large RadioTelescope installation (ATACAMA) that points to many standards.

ftp://ftp.eso.org/projects/alma-23kv/SPE/applicable_documents_SPE/AD-109/SITE-20.00.00.00-024-A-SPE-1.pdf

Hope these at least point you to further info.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dlgoff, berkeman and anorlunda
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top