What is the Resultant Polarization Angle for Two Perpendicular Harmonic Waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eprparadox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gre Polarization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the polarization angle for two perpendicular harmonic waves described by specific equations. It is established that for the waves to represent a plane polarized wave, the phase difference phi must equal zero, allowing the waves to oscillate in a single plane despite being at right angles. The resultant wave's direction can be found using inverse tangent calculations, confirming that the waves maintain a constant ratio of magnitudes. The polarization plane is determined to be at a 45-degree angle to the axes of the individual waves. Understanding this relationship helps clarify the conditions for achieving plane polarization in transverse waves.
eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Two harmonic transverse waves of the same frequency with displacements at right
angles to each other can be represented by the equations:

y = yo*sin(wt-kx)
z = zo*sin(wt-kx + phi)

where yo and zo are nonzero constants

The equations represent a plane polarized wave if phi equals
(a) sqrt(2)
(b) 3pi/2
(c) pi/2
(d) pi/4
(e) 0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm kind of lost. If the two displacements are at a 90 degrees to each other then the phi term will only push one sine out of phase with the other one, but the two waves will still have displacements that are 90 degrees apart. So i have no idea how you can ever get a plane polarized wave since the wave would have to be sitting in one plane and these waves are not. The answers are given so I know the correct one, but I want to understand how to solve.

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi eprparadox,

eprparadox said:

Homework Statement


Two harmonic transverse waves of the same frequency with displacements at right
angles to each other can be represented by the equations:

y = yo*sin(wt-kx)
z = zo*sin(wt-kx + phi)

where yo and zo are nonzero constants

The equations represent a plane polarized wave if phi equals
(a) sqrt(2)
(b) 3pi/2
(c) pi/2
(d) pi/4
(e) 0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm kind of lost. If the two displacements are at a 90 degrees to each other then the phi term will only push one sine out of phase with the other one, but the two waves will still have displacements that are 90 degrees apart. So i have no idea how you can ever get a plane polarized wave since the wave would have to be sitting in one plane and these waves are not.

But the idea is that for the correct phi value the combined wave will oscillate in one plane.

For example, let's say that at some particular time, you find the vector sum of the y and z waves, and the resultant wave makes an angle of 30 degrees (just as an example) with the z axis.

For the correct phi value, the vector sum will make the same angle with the z axis for all times, and thus the resultant wave will only oscillate in a plane (a plane that is tilted with respect to the coordinate planes that the individual y and z waves oscillate in).

Does that make sense?
 
Thanks so much for the response. I think it makes sense. So the answer is that phi is zero and so if that's true, then the two waves are in phase entirely but just with displacements at 90 degrees to each other.

Does this mean that the plane in which the wave is polarized is at a 45 degree angle to the y-axis or the z-axis?

Thanks again.
 
eprparadox said:
Thanks so much for the response. I think it makes sense. So the answer is that phi is zero and so if that's true, then the two waves are in phase entirely but just with displacements at 90 degrees to each other.

And more importantly, when phi=0 the ratio of the magnitudes of the y and z waves is constant.


Does this mean that the plane in which the wave is polarized is at a 45 degree angle to the y-axis or the z-axis?

No, you find the direction of the resultant the way you would for the vector addition of any perpendicular vectors: by using the inverse tangent. (In fact, that's how you know that the answer is phi=0, because when you take the inverse tangent of z/y, for example, you want the trig functions to cancel.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top