What is the role of elasticity in space-time according to Sakharov's theory?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity distorts space-time, which is predicted to return to a flat configuration when the mass causing the distortion is removed. However, gravitational waves can leave a lasting imprint on space-time, altering its geometry permanently. Space is described as elastic and flexible, essential for the universe's stability, but it is not a substance with inherent properties like elasticity. The relationship between gravity and space-time suggests that if gravity were to vanish, space and time would also cease to exist. Sakharov's theory introduces the concept of "elasticity of space" to explain these effects within the framework of general relativity.
Fuzzy Logic
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
If gravity distorts space-time, does space-time return to equilibrium when the gravity mass is gone (let's say it vanished instantly)? If so, what happens to other satellite masses that are caught in the same gravity well?

Does space-time just instantly slip out from under them? Or do the satellites get dragged along with it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Fuzzy Logic said:
If gravity distorts space-time, does space-time return to equilibrium when the gravity mass is gone (let's say it vanished instantly)? If so, what happens to other satellite masses that are caught in the same gravity well?

Does space-time just instantly slip out from under them? Or do the satellites get dragged along with it?

In general, yes the spacetime will return to the background minkowski (read: flat) configuration when the mass is gone. However, gravitational waves can leave an 'imprint' on spacetime even after they have passed through a region, permanently altering the spacetime geometry. Look up gravitational wave memory.
 
Space is definitely elastic and flexible. If it wasn't the universe would have shattered into an infinite amount pieces a long time ago.
 
Space is not a 'substance', so it has no properties such as elasticity. Gravity affects 'things' that pass through the gravitational field - like matter and photons - altering their path. Some would say the gravitational field IS the fabric of space. Some would even say that if gravity suddenly disappeared, so would space.
re: http://www.astronomycafe.net/gravity/gravity.html

"Perhaps the most unusual thing about gravity we know about is that, unlike the other forces of nature, gravity is intimately related to space and time. In fact, space and time are viewed by physicists, and the mathematics of relativity theory, as qualities of the gravitational field of the cosmos that have no independent existence. Gravity does not exist like the frosting on a cake, embedded in some larger arena of space and time. Instead, the 'frosting' is everything, and matter is embedded and intimately and indivisibly connected to it. If you could turn off gravity, it is mathematically predicted that space and time would also vanish!"
 
If spacetime is not a substance, where do virtual particles come from?
 
Sakharov ( 1967 ) suggested accounting for the effects of general relativity by introducing the concept of an "elasticity of space," analogous to the well-known curvature of space-time.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top