What is the Second Step in Feynman's Deduction of the Sound Wave Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The second step in Feynman's deduction of the sound wave equation involves a linear approximation, where the equality is more accurately represented as an approximation. This approximation uses the derivative of the function f evaluated at d0 to estimate the change in f as d varies slightly. Specifically, the expression f(d0 + de) is approximated by f(d0) plus the product of de and the derivative f'(d0). This method relies on the concept that the change in the function can be approximated by the slope of the tangent line at the point d0. Understanding this approximation clarifies the relationship between the terms in the equation.
PeSoberbo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am studying the sound wave equation deducted by Feynman in his lectures. In section 47-3:

P0 + Pe = f(d0 + de) = f(d0) + de f'(d0)

Where f'(d0) stands for the derivative of f(d) evaluated at d=d0. Also, de is very small.

I do not understand the second step of the equality. Can anyone help me?
Link to the lectures: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_47.html#Ch47-S1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
PeSoberbo said:
I am studying the sound wave equation deducted by Feynman in his lectures. In section 47-3:

P0 + Pe = f(d0 + de) = f(d0) + de f'(d0)

Where f'(d0) stands for the derivative of f(d) evaluated at d=d0. Also, de is very small.

I do not understand the second step of the equality. Can anyone help me?
Link to the lectures: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_47.html#Ch47-S1
The last expression in your equation is only an approximation to the second expression, so '=' should really be ##\approx##. The approximation is called a linear approximation that uses a value on the tangent line at (d0, f(d0)) instead of the value at (d0 + de, f(d0 + de)).

The underlying concept is this:
$$\frac{f(d_0 + d_e) - f(d_0)}{d_e} \approx f'(d_0)$$
Multiply both sides by de and then add f(d0 to both sides to get the relationship you show.
 
Thank you Mark!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top