B What is the shortest wavelength of all? >0 or h?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Petka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavelength
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical shortest wavelength, highlighting that it varies based on the framework used. In quantum mechanics, the Planck length is often considered a minimum limit, while General Relativity suggests that gravity waves can theoretically have any size. There is no absolute minimum wavelength, as wavelengths can appear shorter depending on the observer's relative motion. Additionally, the Planck length and Planck constant are distinct concepts, with the former representing a distance and the latter related to angular momentum. Overall, the nature of wavelengths is complex and influenced by various physical theories.
Daniel Petka
Messages
147
Reaction score
16
Theoretically of course, what is the shortest wavelength of all? Is it the size of the Planck's constant or just anything over zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daniel Petka said:
Theoretically of course, what is the shortest wavelength of all? Is it the size of the Planck's constant or just anything over zero?
Depends on what framework you are working with. Quantum mechanics has a minimum limit, which is the Planck length, General Relativity has smooth space and infinitely divisible energy, so gravity waves can be any size (theoretically.)
 
There is no minimum wavelength. Not even the Planck length. In the frame of reference of an observer traveling at a high velocity opposite the direction the wave is traveling, the wave would have a significantly shorter wavelength.
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner
Daniel Petka said:
Theoretically of course, what is the shortest wavelength of all? Is it the size of the Planck's constant or just anything over zero?

You should not confuse the Planck length (which has units of distance) with Planck constant (which has units of angular momentum).
 
With De Broglie's formula a fast moving heavy particle would have a wavelength smaller than Plank's length. (yeah not constant :p)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top