What is the significance of company A's stock price on December 10th, 2005?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Numnum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Numnum
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You know that the only time company A's stocks were traded for $25 a share was on December 10th, 2005. You also know that on June 3rd of 2001 the price was $41 a share and on September 17th of 2010 it was $34. Assuming that stock prices change continuously, what conclusion can you make about company A's stock price on any other day?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The stock doesn't seem to change much everyday. Maybe there's never a price spike?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're told that the only time the company's stock price was at $25/share was December 10th, 2005. You are then given prices on two more days, one before Dec 10, 2005, and one after. Are those prices higher or lower than $25. If the prices change have to change continuously between those three dates, what does knowing that Dec 10, 2005 was the only day the price was $25 tell you?
 
Mute said:
You're told that the only time the company's stock price was at $25/share was December 10th, 2005. You are then given prices on two more days, one before Dec 10, 2005, and one after. Are those prices higher or lower than $25. If the prices change have to change continuously between those three dates, what does knowing that Dec 10, 2005 was the only day the price was $25 tell you?

$25 was the minimum? And two days other than Dec 10 can have the same stock price?
 
Numnum said:
$25 was the minimum? And two days other than Dec 10 can have the same stock price?

Yes - what kind of minimum is it (local/global)? (Assuming the price has yet to dip below $25 at some point in the future). It's certainly true that it's possible that prices of $34 and $41 can occur more than once. In fact, you know that it has to cross one of those prices at least twice - which one.

I'm not sure if the question wants you to draw any other conclusions, but those were the ones that occurred to me.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top