What is the significance of nontrivial solutions in linear algebraic equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter firecool
  • Start date Start date
firecool
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
finding out non trivial solution of two linear algebraic equations means we have to equate the determinant of the coefficients to zero which in turn means the slope of the two lines are same and they lie on each other. so what is the use of two equations for this? can we get the points or solution from just one equation? and it basically implies that both the lines are same. I'm getting confused here over the significance of the nontrivial solutions. i came across this in the derivation of frequencies of systems with two degress of freedom.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I wonderred why 77 people had looked at this thread but none had responded. Now, I see. It is almost impossible to understand what you are saying. When looking for "non-trivial solutions of two linear algebraic equations" we do NOT "equate the determinant of the coefficients to zero". We do that only when working with homogeneous equations. I.e. something like ax+ by= 0, cx+ dy= 0. If the determinant ad- bc is not 0, then the only solution is x= y= 0. But if ad- bc= 0 then, yes, the two equations are equivalent and there exist an infinite number of solutions: choose x to be anything and y= -(a/b)x which is the same as y= -(c/d)x. You are right that you don't need both equations- but you don't know that until you find that the determinant is 0. And you need both equations to do that.

Typically, such a problem occurs when you have other conditions as well. If your solutions were "trivial" you would not be able to satisfy those additional conditions. So you start with two equations and, typically, see that some parameters must have a certain value so that your equations are the same and you do have non-trivial solutions and can satisfy the other conditions.
 
thanks! :) i think i get it..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top