What is the significance of pions as Goldstone bosons in quantum field theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shakespeare86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson Pion
shakespeare86
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Zee book on quantum field theory.
He wants to explain that pion is the goldstone boson arising from the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the chiral symmetry.
So he
start with the weak decay
\pi^{-} \rightarrow \bar{\nu} + e^{-}
and write this equation
<0|J^{\mu}_{5}|k>=f k^{\mu} (1),
where k is the momentum of the pion.

Then, of course, if you act with k_{\mu} on the left, you get
k_{\mu }<0|J^{\mu}_{5}|k>=f m _{\pi} (2)
and we see that if we consider the pion as a massless spin 0 particle, it is a good candidate for a goldstone boson associated with the spontaneous breaking of the chiral symmetry, because it then follows that
\partial_{\mu} J_{5}^{\mu} = 0

My questions are:
-why in (1) he wrote only the axial current and he doesn't write something like
<0|J^{\mu}-J^{\mu}_{5}|k>
?
-why the right hand side of (1) is just a vector while the left hand side is a pseudovector?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to my second question may be that under spatial riflession \pi is a pseudo scalar and thus, the first member is a vector too. And so follows the answer to the first question: the expectation value of the vector part of the current vanishes because it's a pseudovector and it's impossible to form a pesudo vector with the only vector k.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top