What is the significance of pions as Goldstone bosons in quantum field theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shakespeare86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson Pion
shakespeare86
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Zee book on quantum field theory.
He wants to explain that pion is the goldstone boson arising from the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the chiral symmetry.
So he
start with the weak decay
\pi^{-} \rightarrow \bar{\nu} + e^{-}
and write this equation
<0|J^{\mu}_{5}|k>=f k^{\mu} (1),
where k is the momentum of the pion.

Then, of course, if you act with k_{\mu} on the left, you get
k_{\mu }<0|J^{\mu}_{5}|k>=f m _{\pi} (2)
and we see that if we consider the pion as a massless spin 0 particle, it is a good candidate for a goldstone boson associated with the spontaneous breaking of the chiral symmetry, because it then follows that
\partial_{\mu} J_{5}^{\mu} = 0

My questions are:
-why in (1) he wrote only the axial current and he doesn't write something like
<0|J^{\mu}-J^{\mu}_{5}|k>
?
-why the right hand side of (1) is just a vector while the left hand side is a pseudovector?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to my second question may be that under spatial riflession \pi is a pseudo scalar and thus, the first member is a vector too. And so follows the answer to the first question: the expectation value of the vector part of the current vanishes because it's a pseudovector and it's impossible to form a pesudo vector with the only vector k.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top