What is the significance of S-Matrix in Quantum Field Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted Baas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    S-matrix Theory
Ted Baas
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain Heisenberg's S-Matrix theory in simple terms. Minimals maths please. Please be as expansive as possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As with all questions of this sort, you will get better and more helpful answers if you can share what you've already studied and understood, and then pose a more specific question about the parts that you want help with.
 
I am a novice to all fields of physics except Classical Mechanics. I understand(understand is perhaps too strong a word) Quantum Physics conceptually but not mathematically and I would like to learn about S-Matrix in its entirety(any information helps) but most specifically in its relation to String Theory.
 
You are venturing yourself into subjects you are not prepared to understand. Take your learning curve into the normal order: mathematical methods, classical mechanics (Newtonian, Lagrange, Hamilton, HJ), Electromagnetism, Quantum Mechanics. Typical QM curricula treat scattering theory (operator formalism) as their final chapter.
 
Ted Baas said:
[...] I understand (understand is perhaps too strong a word) Quantum Physics conceptually but not mathematically and I would like to learn about S-Matrix in its entirety [...]
Without maths, one cannot say much more about scattering theory except that it relates what goes "in" to a reaction and what comes "out". Think of scattering of classical bodies off a potential well in classical mechanics as a very simple example.

The term "S-Matrix" (i.e., "scattering matrix") means the expression of this idea in terms of quantum states (or fields) coming into a reaction, and those coming out. Vast amounts of knowledge can be gained from the S-Matrix in quantum field theory -- indeed it's hard to imagine any useful accelerator experiments being possible without an underpinning by S-Matrix theory.

But, as others have hinted, you'll need to start getting into QM on a mathematical level to get more out of the subject than the vague handwaving explanation above.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top