What is the significance of SU(2,4) in Group Theory?

AI Thread Summary
SU(2,4) refers to a specific special unitary group, which is the unitary analog of the special orthogonal group SO(2,4). The "4" in SU(2,4) indicates the dimensionality related to the hermitian inner product of signature (2,4), with the field typically being the complex numbers. Discussions highlight the importance of distinguishing between different types of fields in group theory, as this affects the group's properties. The conversation also emphasizes caution against citing Wikipedia due to its potential instability and unreliability. Understanding SU(2,4) is crucial for grasping concepts in advanced group theory.
princeton118
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What does this expression, SU(2,4), mean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's the notation for a specific group. Also see this Wikipedia page, specifically under the "Generalized ... group" section.
 
But in the Generalized Linear Group the second term in the parentheses is the Field. But here what does the "4" mean?
 
Probably the finite field with 4 elements.
 
I see thanks!
 
Correction! Correct field is C with hermitian IP of signature (2,4)

Uh oh, hope the OP sees this! The special unitary group SU(p,q) is the unitary analog of the special orthogonal group SO(p,q). For example, SO(2,4) comes from the pseudo-euclidean inner product
<br /> \left(\vec{u}, \, \vec{v} \right) =<br /> -u_1 \, v_1 - u_2 \, v_2 + u_3 \, v_3 + u_4 \, v_4 + u_5 \, v_5 + u_6 \, v_6<br />
and SU(2,4) comes from the hermitian analog. The field is generally the complex numbers for unitary groups or real numbers for orthogonal groups, but other fields can be considered and then an extra letter is added to indicate this.

How annoying! The only hit Google gives me is " Generalized special unitary group" in this version of this WP article which I happen to know is basically correct, but do as I say not as I do: never cite Wikipedia articles because Wikipedia is unstable and unreliable!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top