What is the significance of SU(2,4) in Group Theory?

princeton118
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What does this expression, SU(2,4), mean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's the notation for a specific group. Also see this Wikipedia page, specifically under the "Generalized ... group" section.
 
But in the Generalized Linear Group the second term in the parentheses is the Field. But here what does the "4" mean?
 
Probably the finite field with 4 elements.
 
I see thanks!
 
Correction! Correct field is C with hermitian IP of signature (2,4)

Uh oh, hope the OP sees this! The special unitary group SU(p,q) is the unitary analog of the special orthogonal group SO(p,q). For example, SO(2,4) comes from the pseudo-euclidean inner product
<br /> \left(\vec{u}, \, \vec{v} \right) =<br /> -u_1 \, v_1 - u_2 \, v_2 + u_3 \, v_3 + u_4 \, v_4 + u_5 \, v_5 + u_6 \, v_6<br />
and SU(2,4) comes from the hermitian analog. The field is generally the complex numbers for unitary groups or real numbers for orthogonal groups, but other fields can be considered and then an extra letter is added to indicate this.

How annoying! The only hit Google gives me is " Generalized special unitary group" in this version of this WP article which I happen to know is basically correct, but do as I say not as I do: never cite Wikipedia articles because Wikipedia is unstable and unreliable!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top