What Is the Significance of Using Buffers of the Same Concentration?

AI Thread Summary
The significance of using buffers of the same concentration lies in maintaining a stable pH level in chemical reactions. The discussion emphasizes that knowing the concentration ratio is crucial for solving related problems, particularly when both buffers are assumed to have a 1:1 ratio. Without this assumption, determining the pH or the behavior of the solution becomes challenging. The conversation highlights that if different concentrations were used, it would complicate or nullify the solution. Understanding the importance of concentration in buffers is essential for accurate chemical analysis.
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't see how you can approach this question without knowing what are concentrations of both - or at least what is their ratio. What they say is - assume concentration ratio 1:1.

If you don't see how it works, try to solve the problem without knowing anything about Cacid and Cbase. You won't move far.
 


I solved it
I am just intrigued as to why they said "same concentration"
 


I still fail to see what you are asking.

If they would say "different concentrations" there would be no solution.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top