What is the significance of using electron-volts in chemistry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pwood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of electron-volts (eV) in the context of cell potentials in chemistry. The original poster questions whether it is appropriate to refer to electric potential in electron-volts, as eV is primarily a unit of energy. While it is acknowledged that 1 eV corresponds to the energy gained by an electron when accelerated through a potential difference of 1 volt, there is skepticism about its use as a unit of electric potential in electrochemistry. Participants suggest that the instructor may be conflating energy and potential or using eV as a shorthand for standard electrode potentials. The consensus leans towards the need for clarification from the instructor, ideally framed in a way that aligns with conventional units of volts.
pwood
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
My instructor in my college chemistry class continually refers to cell potentials (as in battery cell potentials) in units of electron-volts. Is there any case in physics or chemistry where this is correct? My understanding is that an electron-volt is generally a unit of energy, but I didn't think it was correct to use it for electric potential, cell or not.
Thanks,
PWood
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Electron volts are used when the energy involved is extremely small.

1 eV = 1.6 x 10^-19 J...so when you are talking about very small amounts of energy, it is more convenient to express the energy as an eV than a joule.
 
Hi Woopydalan,

I appreciate your post, but I already stated that I knew that it was a unit of energy. What I am asking is: are there any uses of the electron-volt that interpret it as a unit of electric potential? That is how my chemistry instructor uses it, I believe incorrectly.

I am aware that it is used in some fields as a unit of mass, momentum, and distance. I am in doubt that it is ever used as a unit of electric potential.

So, that is the question: is it ever (correctly) interpreted as a unit of electric potential?
 
Two cases : Either the professor is taking off on wrong foot (happens all the time) or he actually may mean another thing.

Case 1: Just delete the term electron in your mind. You're more than happy person.

Case 2: 1 Electron volt is the energy of an electron when it is accelerated by the potential difference of 1 Volt. Since in electrochemistry, the cells (or Redox couple) we make have some electrons transfer from Anode to Cathode, accompanied by the generation of Potential, "Maybe" he may had mixed those two things as one.

Your best bet is still to ask him loud and clear. And if you are afraid, ask him in a form of a textbook question, in which the answer is in form of Volts.
 
He's probably expressing the potential as Eo Volts... which is a standard electrode (the "Eo" part) in units of volts.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top