What is the smallest vertical force which will move the crate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Air
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Vertical
AI Thread Summary
A crate weighing 50N remains stationary despite a 10N horizontal pull due to static friction with a coefficient of 0.4. To determine the smallest vertical force required to move the crate, the normal force must be correctly calculated, leading to the equation Fy + n - 50 = 0. The static friction force is given by μn, resulting in n being 25N, which means the upward force needed to overcome the weight is 25N. The initial negative result was due to misinterpreting the direction of forces, but the correct upward force is now confirmed as 25N.
Air
Messages
202
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A crate with a weight of 50N rests on a horizontal surface. A person pulls horizontally on it with a force of 10N and it does not move. To start it moving a second person pulls vertically upwards on the crate. If the coefficient of static friction is 0.4, what is the smallest vertical force which will move the crate.


Homework Equations


f_s=\mu_sn


The Attempt at a Solution


ForceDiagram.jpg

R(\rightarrow): 10 - f_s = 0 \implies f_s = 10N
f_s=\mu_sn_{tot} = (0.4)(n_{tot}) = 10 \implies n_{tot} = 25
n_{tot} = F_y+n \implies F_y = 25-50 =-25N

4. The problem I encounter
Can you check my method please. I got -25N which is negative hence this is giving me a doubt. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Air said:

Homework Statement


A crate with a weight of 50N rests on a horizontal surface. A person pulls horizontally on it with a force of 10N and it does not move. To start it moving a second person pulls vertically upwards on the crate. If the coefficient of static friction is 0.4, what is the smallest vertical force which will move the crate.


Homework Equations


f_s=\mu_sn


The Attempt at a Solution


ForceDiagram.jpg

R(\rightarrow): 10 - f_s = 0 \implies f_s = 10N
f_s=\mu_sn_{tot} = (0.4)(n_{tot}) = 10 \implies n_{tot} = 25
n_{tot} = F_y+n \implies F_y = 25-50 =-25N

4. The problem I encounter
Can you check my method please. I got -25N which is negative hence this is giving me a doubt. Thanks.

You did everything correctly. The reason for the negative is that your calculations used a downward direction as positive. Thus, your -25 N answer means the 25 N force will be applied upwards.
 


What is n_{tot}? The normal force is just n . The applied upward force is F_y. The crates weight is 50N down. You've got a couple of 'n's' in your equation that need to be corrected.
 


Stovebolt said:
You did everything correctly. The reason for the negative is that your calculations used a downward direction as positive. Thus, your -25 N answer means the 25 N force will be applied upwards.
How can you tell that I took downwards as positive? Even if I resolve upwards I would get: R(\uparrow) : n - 50 = 0 \implies n=50N?

PhanthomJay said:
What is n_{tot}? The normal force is just n . The applied upward force is F_y. The crates weight is 50N down. You've got a couple of 'n's' in your equation that need to be corrected.
My n_{tot} is just a notation I gave for the total force in the upper direction which would be the F_y + n. I should have given that another notation but what's wrong other than that, is my calculation correct?
 


Air said:
R(\rightarrow): 10 - f_s = 0 \implies f_s = 10N
f_s=\mu_sn_{tot} = (0.4)(n_{tot}) = 10 \implies n_{tot} = 25
The static friction is μn, where n is the normal force (not ntot). So μn = 10, thus n = 25.
n_{tot} = F_y+n \implies F_y = 25-50 =-25N
The vertical forces must add to zero:
Fy + n - 50 = 0 (Where Fy is the applied vertical force.)
Solve for Fy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Doc Al said:
The static friction is μn, where n is the normal force (not ntot). So μn = 10, thus n = 25.

The vertical forces must add to zero:
Fy + n - 50 = 0 (Where Fy is the applied vertical force.)
Solve for Fy.

Ah yes, that gives a positive answer, ##F_y = 50 - 25 = 25N##.

The problem was that I took the vertical force combined with the normal force to equal the normal force and used that in the equation.

It makes sence. Thanks to everyone for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top