What is the solution to a^3+b^3+c^3 = 495, a+b+c = 15, and abc = 105?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abc
  • Start date Start date
abc
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
solve :
a^3+b^3+c^3 = 495
a+b+c = 15
abc = 105
thanx
regards
abc
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would probably start by cubing the second equation, and then I'd substitute the first and second equation wherever possible in the new expression. After that I'd look for a possible factorisation of the equation so that I can substiute b + c and bc in terms of a. Hopefully this will yield a simple (that is, a low degree) polynomial in a. And similarly for the other variables (after the value of a has been determined).
 
Assume a whole number solution:
abc=105 means then that only 1,3,5,7,105 can be solutions;
and only 3,5,7 can be summed to 15
7^3=343
5^3=125
3^3=27
Sum=495
 
Arildno's assumption is acceptable (and in this case results in saving a lot of time)because the odds of finding integer values for the three expressions get vanishingly small unless a,b,c are integers.

And it's easy to narrow down to the choice of 3,5,7 for getting sum = 15, by noticing how close 15 is to thrice the cube root of 105. You probably get it faster by inspection.
 
Last edited:
OMG...LOL!


I miss the dinosaurs.-ss
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top