What is the specific gravity of the disk?

AI Thread Summary
The specific gravity of the cylindrical disk is calculated to be 0.9097, with a density of 909.70 kg/m^3. The submerged volume of the disk is determined to be 0.00816 m^3, leading to a depth of 0.01275 m below the water level. The calculation for the volume above water was initially incorrect, with a corrected depth of 0.001266 m above the water level. The final verification suggests that adding the submerged and above-water depths should equal the original volume. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accuracy in calculations related to buoyancy and volume.
sona1177
Messages
171
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A cylindrical disk has volume 8.97 x 10^-3 m^3 and mass 8.16 kg. The disk is floating on the surface on some water with its flat surfaces horizontal. The area of each flat surface is .640 m^2. What is the specific gravity of the disk? How far below the water level is its bottom surface? How far above the water level is its top surface?

I know that the S.G. is .9097, and the density is 909.70 kg/m^3. So Vsubmerged = (Density of disk x Volume of disk)/density of fluid.

I got a value of .00816 m^3.

Then from Vsubmerged=Area x depth under water =.00816/.640=.01275 m

The last question is the one I am unsure about.

I subtracted the value of the object from V submerged to get 8.1 x 10^-4 for the volume not submerged (above water) and got 8.1 x 10^-4. So then V =Ad and V/A= 8.1 10^-4/.640=.01266 m.

I am not sure that I did the last part correctly, can you please tell me if I took the right approach?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


I agree with your answers until the last part, where you say 0.00816/.64 = 0.01266 m

I think you've just missed a zero, so it would be 0.001266 m

Check it by adding the two depths and multiplying by the base area to give the original volume.
 


Sleve123 said:
I agree with your answers until the last part, where you say 0.00816/.64 = 0.01266 m

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top